Re: Expanding Earth -> Why did Achiles never reach the turtle ?
From: Rod Burns (morrainx_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/06/05
- Next message: Rod Burns: "Re: Expanding Earth -> Why did Achiles never reach the turtle ?"
- Previous message: jonathan: "Re: a turning point for all the world?"
- In reply to: George: "Re: Expanding Earth -> Why did Achiles never reach the turtle ?"
- Next in thread: Rod Burns: "Re: Expanding Earth -> Why did Achiles never reach the turtle ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:59:45 -0500
"George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:oIOCd.282358$5K2.42206@attbi_s03...
>
> "Carsten Troelsgaard" <carsten.troelsgaard@mail.dk> wrote in message
> news:41dbb3f7$0$149$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
>>
>> "J. Taylor" <jota@gorge.NOSPAM.net> skrev i en meddelelse
>> news:5bplt0djnsvv25njc952sb8mlui3to788g@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:21:13 GMT, "George"
>>> <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Answer? There is no missing buck. Actually, I fail to see how it is
>>> even clever.
>>>
>>> JT
>>
>> We fail to see what you contribute to geology except for pompous comments
>> on everyones level of intelligence.
>
> I'll second that remark.
>
Owwww. Did I forgot ?
*******************************************
** Hoppy new year 2005, to everyone, PT or EE !!! **
*******************************************
BTW, from my slur humble-numble ignorant point of view, I've just no idea
why Dinosaurs could not be BIGGGG ! So I really do not need to expand the
earth to understand the dinosaurs. I watched the Animal Channel with the
kids a couple of time, and I can figure out a giraffe gets hurt when it
falls after a tranquilizing shot, but I've never seen an elephant getting a
bruise this way, and it is bigger than the giraffe, so : why the Expanding
Earth ?
Now if some people feel that the poor dinosaurs would get hurt when they
fall, and would then need an inflatable earth to walk on ( as a kind of
cushion ?) I suggest try some pataphysics experiment, like dropping the
closests thing to the dinosaurs we have near at hand - a crocodile - from
the fifth floor and see how many times it bounces, or so.
Then - of course, there is still the possssssibility (little little
little... though) that Einstein misssssed some interresting point in
Expanded Relativity. So - maybe - there is an explanation to the dinosaurs
not getting a bruise when running after each other in the muddy little
earth.
The earth was not smaller, but time was slower.
So when the dinosaurs ran after each other in the mud, they thought :
GizzhowfastIamtheTRexwillnevergetme - but in reality, theyyyy weeeerrrreeee
veeeerrrrryyyyy sllllooooooouuuuuwwww aaaannnnnddd wwwwhhheeeennn
thhhhhhheeeyyyy haaaappppeeeennnneeedddd ttttoooo fffaaalllll thhhheeeeyyy
neeevvveeerrr ggoooottt huuuurrrtttt !!!!!
But as everybody was vvveeeerrrrryyy slow in these ancient times, they never
noticed, and the Trex still had a hard time getting on some food 'cuz it was
as slow as the others.
Nobody found where wuz de mizing BUCK, I reckon. I'll tell you if an EEer
tells me how many times does a crocodile bounce from the fifth floor.
I'm - almost - sure I didn't insult anybody in this post.
...
I got nooo idea about earth spins and geology. yet I have an interest in
having geology explaining dead people to me, and maybe some day tell me
where not to go for holiday.
After a linear aggression (PT with me ! EEers out ! those not with me are
against me !), and a retaliatory feedback, ... new computation, polynomial
approximation of the dynamics of the group.... second order answer.
1) EEers, don't allow yourselves get polluted by the creationists. I read
lovely things about dinosaurs on a half as small earth, because otherwise
they would break their necks because of their own weigth. etc...
2) I like PT because I can *see* plates on the geography of the earth.
That's enough to me. I just rely on necessary science. I just do not need EE
to read an atlas. I just need PT.
3) maybe you lot have details as thin as those between Newton and Einstein
to talk about, but my everyday geological life cannot perceive them. What I
can perceive however is creationnists pollution. It smells.
4) maybe PT does not explain every thin detail but it works on average.
5) maybe you EEers can cut links with ....(creationists)... and rename the
EE to something more appropriate, and continue working to explain what the
PT can't explain. I saw something about the india-burma plate limit that
needs in effect some positive explanation.
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ng/hulk.html
I just can't admit lunatic goddists would explain the world to me.
!!! That's all folks !!!
I'll quit for a few days
- Next message: Rod Burns: "Re: Expanding Earth -> Why did Achiles never reach the turtle ?"
- Previous message: jonathan: "Re: a turning point for all the world?"
- In reply to: George: "Re: Expanding Earth -> Why did Achiles never reach the turtle ?"
- Next in thread: Rod Burns: "Re: Expanding Earth -> Why did Achiles never reach the turtle ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
