Re: Expanding Earth -> Why did Achiles never reach the turtle ?

From: George (george_at_wtfiswrongwithyou.com)
Date: 01/06/05 

Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:13:06 GMT

"David Ford" <Nospam@internode.on.net> wrote in message
news:41dca47c@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> Rod Burns wrote:
>
>> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> escribió en el mensaje
>> news:oIOCd.282358$5K2.42206@attbi_s03...
>>
>>>"Carsten Troelsgaard" <carsten.troelsgaard@mail.dk> wrote in message
>>>news:41dbb3f7$0$149$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
>>>
>>>>"J. Taylor" <jota@gorge.NOSPAM.net> skrev i en meddelelse
>>>>news:5bplt0djnsvv25njc952sb8mlui3to788g@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:21:13 GMT, "George"
>>>>><george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Answer? There is no missing buck. Actually, I fail to see how it is
>>>>>even clever.
>>>>>
>>>>>JT
>>>>
>>>>We fail to see what you contribute to geology except for pompous comments on
>>>>everyones level of intelligence.
>>>
>>>I'll second that remark.
>>>
>>
>> Owwww. Did I forgot ?
>>
>> *******************************************
>> ** Hoppy new year 2005, to everyone, PT or EE !!! **
>> *******************************************
>>
>>
>> BTW, from my slur humble-numble ignorant point of view, I've just no idea
>> why Dinosaurs could not be BIGGGG ! So I really do not need to expand the
>> earth to understand the dinosaurs. I watched the Animal Channel with the
>> kids a couple of time, and I can figure out a giraffe gets hurt when it
>> falls after a tranquilizing shot, but I've never seen an elephant getting a
>> bruise this way, and it is bigger than the giraffe, so : why the Expanding
>> Earth ?
>>
>> Now if some people feel that the poor dinosaurs would get hurt when they
>> fall, and would then need an inflatable earth to walk on ( as a kind of
>> cushion ?) I suggest try some pataphysics experiment, like dropping the
>> closests thing to the dinosaurs we have near at hand - a crocodile - from
>> the fifth floor and see how many times it bounces, or so.
>>
>> Then - of course, there is still the possssssibility (little little
>> little... though) that Einstein misssssed some interresting point in
>> Expanded Relativity. So - maybe - there is an explanation to the dinosaurs
>> not getting a bruise when running after each other in the muddy little
>> earth.
>>
>> The earth was not smaller, but time was slower.
>>
>> So when the dinosaurs ran after each other in the mud, they thought :
>> GizzhowfastIamtheTRexwillnevergetme - but in reality, theyyyy weeeerrrreeee
>> veeeerrrrryyyyy sllllooooooouuuuuwwww aaaannnnnddd wwwwhhheeeennn
>> thhhhhhheeeyyyy haaaappppeeeennnneeedddd ttttoooo fffaaalllll thhhheeeeyyy
>> neeevvveeerrr ggoooottt huuuurrrtttt !!!!!
>>
>> But as everybody was vvveeeerrrrryyy slow in these ancient times, they never
>> noticed, and the Trex still had a hard time getting on some food 'cuz it was
>> as slow as the others.
>>
>> Nobody found where wuz de mizing BUCK, I reckon. I'll tell you if an EEer
>> tells me how many times does a crocodile bounce from the fifth floor.
>>
>> I'm - almost - sure I didn't insult anybody in this post.
>>
>>
>> ....
>>
>> I got nooo idea about earth spins and geology. yet I have an interest in
>> having geology explaining dead people to me, and maybe some day tell me
>> where not to go for holiday.
>
>
> so, have not a clue - correct!
>
>
>> After a linear aggression (PT with me ! EEers out ! those not with me are
>> against me !), and a retaliatory feedback, ... new computation, polynomial
>> approximation of the dynamics of the group.... second order answer.
>
>
> who cares what your petty biases are?
>
>
>> 1) EEers, don't allow yourselves get polluted by the creationists. I read
>> lovely things about dinosaurs on a half as small earth, because otherwise
>> they would break their necks because of their own weigth. etc...
>
>
> We don't. But I have certainly met a number of PLATE TECTONICS creationists
> in my time.
>
>
>> 2) I like PT because I can *see* plates on the geography of the earth.
>> That's enough to me. I just rely on necessary science. I just do not need EE
>> to read an atlas. I just need PT.
>
>
> And as I just pointed out to another disinterested SIMPLIST twit (sorry,
> simplist ignorance and science are immicible), you won't see anything but a
> distortion with a 2-D atlas.
>
>
>> 3) maybe you lot have details as thin as those between Newton and Einstein
>> to talk about, but my everyday geological life cannot perceive them. What I
>> can perceive however is creationnists pollution. It smells.
>
>
> Who are you claiming (with out a clue or evidence) is a creationist again? Do
> I talk like a fuckin religious christian man dickhead?

No, but you do sound like someone who would have a little Carey nativity shrine
set up in your barn, with a little Baby Carey playing the part of baby Jesus,
and you lighting little candles around his head ("full of grace"), while J.
Taylor plays the part of a little sacrificial lamb coming to the slaughter. Say
"amen", brother!