Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk
From: george of the jungle (keys_at_somewhere.not.here)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: George: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Previous message: Hank Oredson: "Re: Axioms rescued from previous thread"
- In reply to: don findlay: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Next in thread: George: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Reply: George: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:56:04 -1000
On 13 Jan 2005 14:36:55 -0800, "don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote:
>
>George wrote:
>> http://www.whoi.edu/media/2004_jian_Lin.html
>
>I like the bit where it says, ...:-
>
>> grind slowly past each other or collide, building
>> up stress.
>
>I find this terribly funny, in a black sort of way. All this grinding
>and colliding, ...dead bodies everywhere, cities falling down, and you
>lot think plate tectonics is for real, even argue the point using ad
>hominems as your main rationale, yet you can't even get a proper handle
>on it. Can't even answer a simple question like:-
>http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ng/strikebeach.html
Take a look at the magnetic isochrons (stripes) on the seafloor.
Your stress field for the strike slip events is not consistent with
observations.
_george
- Next message: George: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Previous message: Hank Oredson: "Re: Axioms rescued from previous thread"
- In reply to: don findlay: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Next in thread: George: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Reply: George: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|