Re: Major Caribbean Earthquakes and Tsunamis a Real Risk

From: Ralph Nesbitt (ralph-nesbitt_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 01/18/05 

Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 04:20:33 GMT

"George Ver. 4.0.2" <georgeV4.0.2@yadayada.net> wrote in message
news:cscns501nep@news3.newsguy.com...
>
> "don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
> news:1105830846.300105.138790@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Skywise wrote:
> > > "don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in
> > news:1105710712.070512.278250
> > > @z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
> > >
> > > <Snipola>
> > > > Again, the interpretation is the USGS's, not mine. Of course
> > there's a
> > > > misinterpretation there. That's the point. >
> > >
> > > Are you saying that both images came from another website?
> > >
> > > Could you please provide links so we can see them in full context
> >
> > No, not another website. I drew the images, but of course I had a quick
> > squiz to see if I was remembering right,
>
> So, which is it? Did you display them exactly as the USGS did on their
site,
> or not?
>
>
> ..because (after so many
> > years)I couldn't (still can't) understand how plate tectonics can live
> > with that nonsensical conundrum re. the contradiction in orientation of
> > the principle stress axes for the major structures of the ocean floors
> > - and still think 'convection'.
>
> So you disagreed with the sense of orientation presented by the USGS,
> changed their drawings as presented, then said their drawings were wrong?
Is
> this what you are saying in a round about way?
>
Typical description of a DF post based on other material from other sites.
>
> Updated George Ver. 4.0.2
>
<balance of post sniped>
Ralph Nesbitt

Quantcast