Re: Harvard Pres: Women Lack Ability In Math, Sciences

From: George (george_at_wtfiswrongwithyou.com)
Date: 01/18/05


Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:30:12 GMT


"Philip Lewis" <nottelling@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:354hkpF4hsn18U1@individual.net...
>
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote in message
> news:pP7Hd.10228$yY6.1633@attbi_s02...
>>
>> "Philip Lewis" <nottelling@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:353d5fF4ecc06U1@individual.net...
>>>
>>> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote in message
>>> news:EfYGd.9267$yY6.7592@attbi_s02...
>>>>
>>>> "Way Back Jack" <nospam@nospam.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:41ec4145.37884374@news.newshosting.com...
>>>>> Geez, that's what the old timers said before it became
>>>>> politically-incorrect to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gee, my wife graduated cum laud with a double B.S. in geology and
>>>> mathematics.
>>> So your wife is ALL WOMEN - well thats a 'convincing' argument. Next comes a
>>> feminist who says 'ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS AND THATS ALL THEY ARE' - after all
>>> said feminist need only to point to ONE MAN to prove her case using your
>>> 'logic'!
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>
>> The Harvard professor said "women lack natural ability in some fields".
>
> He said a lot more than that but YOU in common with those who are seeking to
> repress any scientific findings which do not support their prejudice jump on
> out of context 'quotes' as if that was the whole argument that was made - for
> example in the same article it is reported ""It's possible I made some
> reference to innate differences," he said.He said people "would prefer to
> believe" that the differences in
> performance between the sexes are due to social factors, "but these are things
> that need to be studied." Even so if it is TRUE (and there is a question about
> that for we are depending on absolute accuracy in reporting here!) that he
> made those remarks (i.e. "women lack natural ability in some fields". ) then
> in your response it is clear that you have taken the most extreme and
> ridiculous meaning of that phrase in your attempts to 'debunk' it. For when we
> say (talking about the sexes in the mass or plural level) there are
> differences in men and womens 'spatial abilities' it is not meant to mean that
> EVERY single mam has different or superior spatial skills to every single
> woman. that is why your anecdotal example is completely worthless in the
> context of this discussion
>
> Phil

He said what he said. I offer no apologies or excuses for my response. I know
many women whe are successful scientists and mathematicians, and who are quite
brilliant at what they do. If he (or you, for that matter) has a problem with
women, perhaps he should try to understand them instead of making off-the-wall
stupid remarks that he cannot scientifically or socially justify.

Oh, and please define "mam" in the context of your post, above.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Harvard Pres: Women Lack Ability In Math, Sciences
    ... >>differences in men and womens 'spatial abilities' it is not meant to mean that ... > many women whe are successful scientists and mathematicians, ... My wife's spatial abilities may not be as good as mine, ... social skills are pitiful compared to hers. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: womens and relativity
    ... >> womens have smaller brains ... >> they cant play chess, never been a chess champions, ... one out of one hundred scientists is women ... are you still fokin completly insane you fokin data mekaniker ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Questioning scientific community credibilty
    ... > response to John Harshman and GoerdieBoy ... >>It's unfortunate that you snipped all the context. ... >>that acceptance of the existence of impact craters is ... that the majority of scientists choose to ignore the ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Okay, what the HECK is going on in France?
    ... This is the way scientists use the word. ... A less formal usage, or usage in another context, of the word "theory" does have the meanings you quoted from the dictionary. ... Using one meaning in a context where another meaning is called for gets one into trouble very quickly. ... When experiments show that the proton half life is more than five billion years, the Super String Gordian Knot theory gets tied up in knots. ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: programming bomb-testing experiment on a regular computer
    ... In this case choosing means the random path change of the photon as ... 'interference' to mean the common everyday meaning in the experiment ... Context is everything. ... among scientists who are experts on it. ...
    (talk.origins)