Re: Harvard Pres: Women Lack Ability In Math, Sciences

From: George (george_at_wtfiswrongwithyou.com)
Date: 01/28/05 

Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:11:49 GMT

<jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message news:WaudnfuGYdF8qGfcRVn-rQ@rcn.net...
> In article <0vbKd.31554$IV5.28661@attbi_s54>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>>
>><jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:U5-dnYTLsJMGTWXcRVn-iQ@rcn.net...
> <snip>
>
>>> Nope. You didn't have to work. Mr. Bob did.
>>
>>What the *** are you babbling about?
>
> The fact that you did not have to work in order to eat.

Really? Do you think the food on my table gets there by magic?

>> .. Face it. Your bull*** comment was
>>proven wrong, so get over it.
>
> No, it wasn't proven wrong. The statement was true for everyone
> I evalated back then.

NOT!

>>You will also
>>> note that he relied on a lawyer while young. I didn't say it
>>> was a good test. I did say, or tried to say, that it was a
>>> general rule. My point was that people who didn't learn
>>> how to work didn't learn how things got made or processed.
>>
>>No, you said "I used to be able to tell if a person was a Democrat by
> learning
>>if they ever had to work as kid :-). I found no exceptions back then; they
> never
>>had to work."
>>
>>We've proven that statement to be obvious bull***.
>
> No, you haven't. I never met the Mr. Bob poster. Even if
> I had met you, my statement would still have been true.

You're statement is nothing by neocom tripe.

> I should probably specify that this test is no longer good
> because we now have two generations that have a general
> lack of knowledge about work and how things get done.
>

The only one I see here not working is you. So perhaps you should apply your
stupid argument to yourself and leave everyone else out of it.

>>
>>> They'ld never set foot in a factory nor worked a farm. They
>>> didn't learn about mechanical advantages. They never _had_
>>> to solve a problem, a real problem, of survival for themselves.
>>> They were taken care of and assumed that somebody would always
>>> be around to take care of them. Hence, when there wasn't
>>> or there wasn't a perceived somebody, they created government
>>> departments to fulfill the function. There exist very few
>>> Democrats who are fiscally conservative; I think there are
>>> fewer who actually know about how things get done.
>>>
>>
>>And now you are her making more bull*** statements. But that's just fine
> with
>>me. If you want to make yourself look like the dumbass you obviously are,
> go
>>for it, dude.
>
> People have called me worse. Someday, you may mature enough to
> learn that name-calling, when losing an argument, is a child's
> ploy.
>
> /BAH

Keep it up, and I'm sure we'll all call you much worse.

Quantcast