Re: More Stuff on the Canary Islands Tsunami

From: Michael Mcneil (weatherlawyer_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/01/05 

Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:14:13 +0000 (UTC)

"Daryl Krupa" <icycalmca@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1107236311.667456.77480@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com

>
> Michael Mcneil wrote:
> > "NetKop@us"<ft.t@momscomputer> trolled in message
> > news:3mmqv0t5fiojqtrk006pdolua72e2t4h76@4ax.com (snipped. Stick to ascii art, fool.)
> http://www.underreported.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1124
> > Remind me again; if it's not tidal, why isn't the energy dispersed in
> a series of splashes?

> This is, indeed, the major objection to their claim;
> their calculations of effect did not take sufficient account of
> energy dispersal over distance.

Leaving aside the fact that no tidal wave can disperse accordingly
without being tidal (and thereby proving the relationship to tsunamii
with what I have been saying for years. Kindly snipped by you to
preserve my modesty -which editing is accepted by me in all humility:)

It is obvious that the poor deluded fool needs help. He aught to be a
lot less gullible considering his dilligent service on here after all
these years.

The flagship BBC science programme, Horizon, ran with this canard some
time ago. And their endorsement went a long way to provide credibility
to the idea for such gorms as the ineffable Tilley to eff over.

The silly sod. 

-- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG