Re: Earth expansion - puzzled......

From: Hank Oredson (horedson_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 02/09/05 

Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:08:53 GMT

"J. Taylor" <jota@gorge.NOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:d1kh011ksjsf7fkqdqjmnnc9q1n7fkvstl@4ax.com...

>>> No? I thought Gerald just told us PT is consistent with other
>>> sciences, just how does PT pull this off so it does not have to be a
>>> 1:1 ratio?
>>
>>Um ... engage brain a bit ... think about it.
>>The answer is so simple as to be humorous.
>
> I am sure it is, in your mind!

So I am correct, and EE is just plain wrong.
Your only argument is an insult.

>>>>>And it is this constraint which is lacking the ocean's crust age map
>>>>>from NOAA. The length, height, width, and time do not fit, but it
>>>>>does fit expansion, that impossibility.
>>>>
>>>>Form what I've seen of EE models, anything can fit expansion. Including
>>>>subduction.
>>>
>>> Model? It is suppose to be a map of the ocean's crust ages.
>>
>>Cart, horse, reverse.
>
> You do understand the mechanism for EE is EXPANSION?

There is no expansion.
The mechanism is obfuscation and insult.

> The unanswered question is what would cause the expansion.

The question is inane. There is no expansion.

> Which creates the conundrum, if expansion is an impossibility, why
> does so much of the Earth, if not all, have features which fits
> expansion? You can be like George, and just pretend the evidence does
> not exist, but that only makes them go away in the little world which
> you live.

It doesn't.

>>> But this is the major difference between plate tectonics and expanding
>>> Earth. PT tries to explain the evidence so it fits with an Earth with
>>> a constant radius, EE just looks at the evidence and say where it
>>> points.
>>
>>Cart, horse, reverse.
>
> What I wrote above is a contrasting statement, not a sequential one,
> where something follows from the other. You did know this right?
>
> So the cart, horse, reverse has to do with what?

Think.

>>> Fundamental difference. One tries to explain the facts, the other
>>> just follows the facts to a logical conclusion.
>>
>>Huh? More total blather.
>
> Blather in your mind means what?

Exactly what one would expect.
Nonesense.

>>
>>> Big difference.
>>
>>If earth expansion is so obviously correct, you would have a quick,
>>easy, and obvious explanation for that factor of ten to the seventh.
>
> Why would I have "a quick, easy, and obvious explanation" for your
> imagined proof?

The factor of ten to the seventh is not a "proof" it is a fact.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 25/1 shot
    ... horse goes on any going" i wonder if the reverse is true "a horse that ... Tricky that one Paul,to my mind a horse that goes on any going doesn`t offer much except that all going is the same to him,and his form and/or cass remains the same,this is where perhaps a horse with class but favours one sort of going or the other is easier to form an opinion about.If he has his favoured going he will be at a distinct advantage to others that have not,to my mind this is an advantage when taking a view.Does that make any sense? ...
    (uk.sport.horseracing)
  • Re: 25/1 shot
    ... horse goes on any going" i wonder if the reverse is true "a horse that ... Tricky that one Paul,to my mind a horse that goes on any going doesn`t offer ... remains the same,this is where perhaps a horse with class but favours one ...
    (uk.sport.horseracing)
  • Re: Infinite precision floating-point
    ... 0.NIL ... (multiple-value-bind (expansion repeating-value) ... (let* ((reverse (reverse expansion)) ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Earth expansion - puzzled......
    ... >Cart, horse, reverse. ... The unanswered question is what would cause the expansion. ... does so much of the Earth, if not all, have features which fits ... and just pretend the evidence does ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Inscription thoughts (mild spoilers)
    ... the guide is useless... ... I hope my mind isn't leaving before the ... expansion is out! ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)