Re: article in latest sci american
From: Jo Schaper (joschapern4ospam_at_2socketdot.no5net)
Date: 02/13/05
- Next message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "NASA JPL Mars Rover Spirit Fossil Life Discovery Coverup!"
- In reply to: Joe Zorzin: "article in latest sci american"
- Next in thread: jonathan: "Re: article in latest sci american"
- Reply: jonathan: "Re: article in latest sci american"
- Reply: Daryl Krupa: "Re: article in latest sci american"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:07:26 -0600
Joe Zorzin wrote:
> The most recent Scientific American (just got it yesterday) has an article
> which says that agriculture and deforestation of the past several thousand
> years have contributed to global warming and countered what otherwise would
> have been slowly lowering temperatures that would have brought us to the
> brink of another ice age. I'm no scientist, but this sounds like a
> rationalization for global warming.
Depends what you mean by 'rationalization'. Trees and forests are a
great force for the sequestration of CO2. Grasses (and much agriculture
are grasses) do so on a much smaller scale. Large scale plowing breaks
up the CO2 reservoir in the upper levels of the soil. Animals produce
CO2. Now, I'm not sure how factory farming of cattle, pigs and chickens
and the existence of excess humans compares in CO2/methane production
when balanced against the slaughter of bison and oher large animals, but
it could very well be a factor. Hydrocarbon mining (just bringing
methane, oil and other hydrocarbons to surface from below ground) also
increases surficial CO2 levels, long before it is burned as fuel.
Therefore, deforestation reduces the rate of CO2 sequestration, repeated
plowing releases CO2, and animal and excess people (not talking about
their industrialization, just breathing) *might* increase net CO2
production. While this is rational, (assuming the people have numbers to
back up their claims), I don't see how it is 'rationalization'.
There actually is a fair amount of research going into CO2 sequestration
strategies by the US DOE.
- Next message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "NASA JPL Mars Rover Spirit Fossil Life Discovery Coverup!"
- In reply to: Joe Zorzin: "article in latest sci american"
- Next in thread: jonathan: "Re: article in latest sci american"
- Reply: jonathan: "Re: article in latest sci american"
- Reply: Daryl Krupa: "Re: article in latest sci american"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|