Re: Earth expansion - puzzled......

From: J. Taylor (jota_at_gorge.NOSPAM.net)
Date: 02/18/05 

Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:58:22 -0800

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:44:04 +0100, "Carsten Troelsgaard"
<carsten.troelsgaard@mail.dk> wrote:

>
>"George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> skrev i en meddelelse
>news:Ca1Rd.10996$tl3.9884@attbi_s02...
>
>
>>> JT:
>>> And just so you can sleep tonight, what does that prove? Only that
>>> Alaska can be moved in such a manner that it meets the exotic terrane.
>>> Does it prove expansion? NO!!!!! But it does add to my claim towards
>>> abundant evidence for expansion. Sorry, go cry somewhere else.
>
>snip
>
>> What I find so sad is not only how badly that you interpreted those
>> findings, but that you are so eager to use those misinterpretations to
>> make such a fool out of yourself.
>>
>>> If I do find enough evidence to show expansion to the exclusion of all
>>> others I will say so, but for now, all I can say with a degree of
>>> certainty is there is abundant evidence which points to expansion.
>>
>> In other words, you believe that expansion has occurred, though you have
>> no evidence of it other than your belief that there is "adundant evidence"
>> somewhere out there. Thanks for informing us of your relgious beliefs.
>> We'll light some incense in your honor.
>
>Another bare-assed EE'er.

It is amazing how the true believers are always projecting their
religion on to others.

ONLY EE has a complete set of evidence in the ocean floor. It is the
believers in PT whom need to add a 100% more evidence to make their
picture complete by removing two-thirds of the Earth's crust in such a
manner it leaves some holes sucking it all down cleaner than the
surrounding ocean.

When ever they are questioned about it, they appeal to an arsenal of
logical fallacies, which they have done so frequently they still
believe it is a form of thinking, then proudly hold the naked emperor
up to the world as a star of science.

What is even worse, ANY ONE who dares to step out of line by looking
at something else, regardless of how small, is immediately castigated.
This can be finding evidence for a huge flood, questioning and
offering evidence for mantle plumes. The one thing in common
regardless of whether it is something challenging PT, whether small or
large, is a belief system geared towards such behavior.

Face it, for the vast majority of geologist training was to find oil
and minerals, NOT how to evaluate the knowledge they were taught, let
alone know how to examine a theory.

JT

Relevant Pages

  • Re: My Apology to Gerry and Kate McCann
    ... findings, unlike the FSS which indicated initially that there was ... evidence' was needed and that 'no intelligence reliability could be placed ...
    (soc.culture.irish)
  • Re: Study links fatty myelin breakdown to Alzheimers
    ... > findings valid evidence without a larger multicenter trial. ... Now you've changed the criteria, to be evidence that is substanciated ... So we are in agreement that your original statement is false. ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: My Apology to Gerry and Kate McCann
    ... - doesn't lie and has a 100% record. ... findings, unlike the FSS which indicated initially that there was ... evidence' was needed and that 'no intelligence reliability could be placed ...
    (soc.culture.irish)
  • Re: Ping Mike Crowe
    ... parliamentary select committee, then I can see why you feel that Hansard ... archived records of the findings of that committee are of little ... of which are prepared to put masonic law, ... Why are you not able to produce evidence of your statement from a third ...
    (uk.local.hampshire)
  • Re: Detailed ocenaic floor analysis. What does it really tell us?
    ... the earth began expanding 250 million years ago, and they use as evidence ... floor shows expansion and the ocean floor has an age, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)