Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'
From: George (george_at_wtfiswrongwithyou.com)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: lifeform1_at_atlantic.net: "Re: Global warming "hockey stick" questionable?"
- Previous message: george of the jungle: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- In reply to: j: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- Next in thread: Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- Reply: Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:24:12 GMT
"j" <joseph707@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109358507.039620.281500@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
>> In article <1109266625.691089.3510@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
>
>> WTF are you talking about? I am female. I have spent my working
>> years in the computer biz. It was not all male. However, all
>> were very smart and had educational backgrounds in science and
>> math. I worked in the biz from 1969-1987.
>
> In the 1st "computer interfacing" class offered at my school there was,
> as I remember, one female in attendance. I'm sure that today there are
> more females in such classes. I'm just saying that the majority of
> early starters in certain fields have been male. Was it just a
> coincidence that Gates, Woz, Osborne, Roberts, etc were male ?
And this proves?
- Next message: lifeform1_at_atlantic.net: "Re: Global warming "hockey stick" questionable?"
- Previous message: george of the jungle: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- In reply to: j: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- Next in thread: Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- Reply: Mad Mambo Master of Macedonia: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|