Re: Global warming "hockey stick" questionable?
lifeform1_at_atlantic.net
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Owen's Two-Phase Model of Earth Expansion"
- Previous message: George: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- In reply to: BillC: "Re: Global warming "hockey stick" questionable?"
- Next in thread: BillC: "Re: Global warming "hockey stick" questionable?"
- Reply: BillC: "Re: Global warming "hockey stick" questionable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Feb 2005 13:07:25 -0800
February 25, 2005
BillC wrote:
> >
> > Tech Central Station Questions ...
>
> The article is published in Geophysical Research Letters.
No, the article I was commenting on was published
on Tech Central Station. I highly doubt that you
have read the article referenced to, if you had,
you would know that if only questions a small
aspect of the original formalism of Mann, et al.,
and does not detract from their result in any
substantive way, nor does it address the other
numerous data and proxies which support the
general conclusions of global warming and
climate change.
On the other hand, Tech Central Station's
agenda and funding sources are well known.
What is that crammed up your ass, your head?
Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net
- Next message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Owen's Two-Phase Model of Earth Expansion"
- Previous message: George: "Re: Female scientists 'undervalued'"
- In reply to: BillC: "Re: Global warming "hockey stick" questionable?"
- Next in thread: BillC: "Re: Global warming "hockey stick" questionable?"
- Reply: BillC: "Re: Global warming "hockey stick" questionable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]