Re: Stone Houses in Earthquake Areas
From: Charles (ckraft_at_SPAMTRAPwest.net)
Date: 03/08/05
- Next message: Tom Cudzilo: "Re: Interested in U.S. physiographic regions + cross sections"
- Previous message: Robert Baer: "Re: oil bust coming soon"
- In reply to: Silverbackman: "re:Stone Houses in Earthquake Areas"
- Next in thread: Silverbackman: "re:Stone Houses in Earthquake Areas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 05:23:12 GMT
On 6 Mar 2005 23:33:32 -0600,
badassjosh0076@hotmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Silverbackman) wrote:
>Yea that may all be true, but will a Earthquake happen big enough to
>destroy a stone house in an area over 100 miles away? I don't think I
>felt the 1989 earthquake of San Francisco, so is there a chance the
>hands of an major Earthquake from San Francisco could not really
>effect it as much?
>
>
> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
>----------------------------------------------------------
> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
>----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.usenet.com
My town is about 30 miles from the epi of the Northridge quake. We
have stone houses here in town that were built in the 1880s, still
standing. In fact we got no damage from the main shock, first
reported damage here in town was from an aftershock two days later.
-- Charles Does not play well with others.
- Next message: Tom Cudzilo: "Re: Interested in U.S. physiographic regions + cross sections"
- Previous message: Robert Baer: "Re: oil bust coming soon"
- In reply to: Silverbackman: "re:Stone Houses in Earthquake Areas"
- Next in thread: Silverbackman: "re:Stone Houses in Earthquake Areas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
