re:Stone Houses in Earthquake Areas
From: Silverbackman (badassjosh0076_at_hotmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Sneezing on Greenpeace"
- Previous message: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: Super Volcano Will Challenge Civilization, Geologists Warn"
- In reply to: Silverbackman: "Stone Houses in Earthquake Areas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Mar 2005 21:32:08 -0600
Thanks for the replies everyone.
I still want to build a semi-castle made of stone. Castles made of
thick stone usally last forever (I guess accept in Earthquake areas),
so I want to build a house as strong as one.
What is the closest place to Ukiah that is considered safe for stone
house building? I heard that California is somewhat of a subcont.,
and in many hundreds of years it will be gone. Where does the
California sub cont. border? Does it comprise all of California or
does it also include a tiny section of Nevada?
I was thinking Northern Nevada or Montanna are good alternatives, how
much better is it over in those two states?
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
- Next message: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Sneezing on Greenpeace"
- Previous message: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: Super Volcano Will Challenge Civilization, Geologists Warn"
- In reply to: Silverbackman: "Stone Houses in Earthquake Areas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
