Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!
From: Mark Cook (mcook_at_prodigy.net)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Owen's Two-Phase Model of Earth Expansion"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Maybe in reply to: Klaus Heitman: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:30:26 GMT
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:d14nko$hfm$2@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <FxjZd.12257$QM6.1893@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Mark Cook" <mcook@prodigy.net> wrote:
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:d0t6gv$vt$22@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <1110551067.296200.11340@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
> >> "bill" <ford_prefect42@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Not true. You must always sign something when you vote.
> >> >
> >> > Lloyd, how old are you?? It seems to me that your debate style
> >> >has devolved into something I would expect to see from an
> >> >eight-year-old. You flatly declare anything that disagrees with you
to
> >> >be a lie, fail to take into account or even read the evidence
presented
> >> >to you, and never provide evidence for your own positions. You are in
> >> >danger of dropping to VD scotty's status.
> >> > For someone who claims to be a scientist, this is odd behavior.
> >> >
> >> I do look at evidence. But opinions by right-wing web sites are not
> >> evidence. People here stating their opinions that the earth is not
> >warming
> >> or that WMD were found are also not evidence. And I'd like to see you
> >come
> >> here to GA and try to vote without signing anything.
> >
> >Here is some evidence for you Lloyd, it is called the law.
> >
> >Florida Administrative Code 1S-2.013(7)
> >
> >(7) With respect to the presidential preference primary and the general
> >election, any absentee ballot cast for a federal office by an overseas
> >elector which is postmarked or signed and dated no later than the date of
> >the Federal election shall be counted if received no later than 10 days
> from
> >the date of the Federal election as long as such absentee ballot is
> >otherwise proper. Overseas electors shall be informed by the supervisors
> of
> >elections of the provisions of this rule, i.e., the ten day extension
> >provision for the presidential preference primary and the general
> election,
> >and the provision for voting for the second primary.
> >
> >http://www.jurist.law.pitt.edu/election/00-16423.pdf
> >
> >Notice that the LAW says "postmarked OR signed and dated", NOT
"postmarked
> >AND signed and dated". Why did the Democrat try to have legal ballots
> thrown
> >out?? Maybe to steal an election???
>
> It says dating it removes the need for a postmark, as both are ways of
> telling if it was cast in time.
Yet, the Democrats had legal oversea ballots thrown out solely for a lack of
a postmark.
> It does not say a postmark is a substitute for a signature.
Nice attempt at spin, but clearly the law says "postmarked OR signed and
dated". No where does it say that a ballot with a postmark can be
disqualified because it lacks a signature.
>From Medina vs.. Florida Election Canvassing Commission
Discussing the consent decree between the state of Florida and the Federal
Government to being the state in compliance with Federal Code:
"The court notes Judge Stafford's orders and the Administrative Rule were
careful to require that the votes to be counted to be mailed or signed by
election day. In other words, overseas absentee votes, like all the rest of
the votes, cast their votes on election day."
Notice that Judge Stafford says ballots must be mailed, I.a. postmarked, OR
signed, not both.
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/election/medinaorder.pdf
> This section talks about a ballot being received by a
> deadline, in time to be counted.
>
> >
> >Are you telling us that Georgia is in violation of the Overseas Citizens
> >Voting Rights Act and the Federal Voting Assistance Act??
> >
> >
> >
> >
- Next message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Owen's Two-Phase Model of Earth Expansion"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Maybe in reply to: Klaus Heitman: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
