Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!

From: Ian St. John (istjohn_at_noemail.usa)
Date: 03/16/05 

Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:05:23 -0500

Fred J. McCall wrote:
> "Ian St. John" <istjohn@noemail.usa> wrote:
>
>> Vendicar Decarian wrote:
>>> "Fred J. McCall" <fmccall@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>>> It wasn't a UN war in the first place.
>>>
>>>
>>> And that's why it is illegal.
>>
>> You missed him there Vendicar. He was saying that the U.N.
>> multinational forces that freed Iraq were not U.N. troops or acting
>> under U.N auspices. Of course, he is wrong and easily seen as lying.
>
> Except, of course, that you're wrong. While Resolution 678 indeed
> authorized the use of force to expel Iraq from Kuwait (not free Iraq,
> speaking of folks being lost in the ozone),

I corrected that slip. Count on you to try to make something of it after
that.

> the forces were not a UN
> force. The UN appointed no commanders, etc. Instead, they were a
> US-led coalition of national forces operating under a UN fig leaf.

You mean that it was 'officially' a U.N sanctions operation, but that you
are just too stupid to notice the other countries.

> The UN "Authorizes Member States co-operating with the Government of
> Kuwait, unless Iraq on or before 15 January 1991 fully implements, as
> set forth in paragraph 1 above, the above-mentioned resolutions, to
> use all necessary means to uphold and implement resolution 660 (1990)
> and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international
> peace and security in the area."

Ergo, operating under U.N. auspices as a U.N. peacekeeping mission. And the
ceasefire was with the U.N.

Your delusional state is getting in the way of your reading skills.

Facts. Even when admitted by Fred, seem to be foreign to his ideology.

<snip>

Quantcast