Re: plate tectonics


maison.mousse wrote:
> Here is some food for thought.

...and here is some more:-
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/re/christmas.html
Though you've all had plenty of time to think about it, there has not
been a single comment. And Bob Maurer's page on tectonic forces googles
up nothing on newsgroups. You know why? All the 'Stuarts' and
'Georges' and Carstens and all are hiding their collective heads in the
sand. Just the simple Pangaean architecture, as in that link above,
says it all - relative to the Earth's crust the Pangaean Centre was not
then where it is today.

> You might want to look at the pages in the order given for a better
> comprehension.

> http://www.tectonic-forces.org/index.html

> as a post script: An expanding Earth was a proposed
> theory to explain continental drift (plate tectonics).
> It was never given serious consideration for lack of evidence. This
( lack
> of evidence) however has not stopped those in the Geological
sciences to
> embracing other theories that are also with out evidence.

("Like plate tectonics" - df)) (...Is this your postscript or his? I
couldn't find it on his site, so I presume it's yours)

Earth's spin. Good one JOL. (Another brick in the wall)

But surely as a supporter of plate tectonics you should be doing the
right thing and sweeping it under the carpet, should you not?. Letting
this stuff out of the bag will make a lot of Pteros (like Carsten
there), very surly.

Now, can we raise the discussion of how fluid dynamics affects the
surface geology of the Earth, and get away from this asinine model of
convection?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Earth expansion - puzzled......
    ... for years before Plate Tectonics, but plate tectonics won the day. ... burden of proof is back on earth expansionists. ... burden of proof is on the Holocaust deniers to prove the Holocaust did not ... it is not enough to have the evidence. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion
    ... >> expansion and accepted plate tectonics in the end. ... >> still believe in Earth Expansion are badly misguided. ... >> post any real evidence to counter PT evidence or to prove their hypothesis. ... > What a hopeless lying arse you are George, I spoke with Carey at great length ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Ancient Magma Superpiles May Have Shaped The Continents
    ... wrong about conversion, you need to show how this can be a mechanism ... is not in itself a mechanism or evidence for EE. ... this evidence of Plate Tectonics.) ... Pull aided by push gives runaway convection. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion
    ... >> expansion and accepted plate tectonics in the end. ... >> Earth Expansion are badly misguided. ... >> post any real evidence to counter PT evidence or to prove their hypothesis. ... >most disgraceful lying, smearing and defaming stunt I’ve ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Earth expansion - puzzled......
    ... Plate tectonics is a theory and will always be a theory, ... What about the expanding Earth? ... special pleading because it conflicts with science's innate parsimony ... careful scientists always avoid talking of "facts." ...
    (sci.geo.geology)