Re: equatorial bulge
- From: geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 9 May 2005 05:39:40 -0700
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud wrote:
> Gerald,
>
> What could be, in your view, the motor behind that Earth axial and
orbital
> motions then ?
> Inertia ?
>
> This is just to clarify your position.
>
> --
> Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
> Australia Mining Pioneer
> Exploration Geologist
> Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre Mines
> The Great Sandy Desert of Australia
>
> Founder of the True Geology
>
> ~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~
>
>
>
>
>
> <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 1115550905.362240.300380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Don
> >
> "snip "
Hi John
The Newtonian application of terrestial ballistics to planetary motion
relies on a heliocentric cause for axial and orbital motion,he gets
rid of the difficulties of independent axial and independent orbital
motions by combining them into a single sidereal motion referenced off
the Earth's axis and this John is an extremely unethical maneuver.
http://www.pfm.howard.edu/astronomy/Chaisson/AT401/IMAGES/AACHCIR0.JPG
Having lost the true relationship between axial and orbital motion and
isolated everything to a heliocentric orbital cause,this seals the
fate of those who attribute everything to Newtonian 'gravitation and
its attendent vocabulary of inertia,angular momentum ect.There is
another way however to restore axial and orbital motions as independent
motions.
In order to make more sense of the changing relationship between axial
and orbital motion during an ice age (Milankovitch cycle) where the
orbit of a planet becomes more elliptical yet retains Kepler's second
law it is easier to graft in the motion of the solar system in one
direction as it moves around the galactic axis rather than hunt for
some heliocentric cause for the change in orbital geometry.It also
opens a far more productive ground for developmental geological
purposes because in the Newtonian system a stationary Earth is just as
valid as a moving Earth.
There is nothing unduly difficult in incorporating the solar system's
galactic orbital motion as an influence on planetary heliocentric
motion no more than it does incorporating the Earth's motions as a
factor in developmental geology,what may be more difficult is for men
to drop the Newtonian way of thinking or for those who are intimidated
once the words gravitation, inertia, angular momentum are
mentioned,after all this is where Newton cooked the books to get
terrestial ballistics fitted into planetary motion.
It is an enormous and intricate endeavor for people who can keep things
in flux and not retreat to the familiar cozy glow of Newtonian
ballistics (which is wrong anyway) but I assure anyone who is not
afraid to make a temporary mistake,the intuitive way is well worth the
initial effort.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: equatorial bulge
- From: Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
- Re: equatorial bulge
- References:
- equatorial bulge
- From: maison.mousse
- Re: equatorial bulge
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: equatorial bulge
- From: don findlay
- Re: equatorial bulge
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: equatorial bulge
- From: don findlay
- Re: equatorial bulge
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: equatorial bulge
- From: Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
- equatorial bulge
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA Worldwind, & Large scale features in Africa
- Next by Date: Re: Pardon my question
- Previous by thread: Re: equatorial bulge
- Next by thread: Re: equatorial bulge
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|