Re: equatorial bulge

Gerald,

In clear you are saying that Earth motions are not the result of an inertial
impulse going back to the alleged Big Band's Banging Consensus ?
If so you are correct !

It implies then a driving rotational force whose seat is obviously, at
first sight, the Sun.we see ( Amon, Ra )
The evident model in 2d would be a rotor type of washing machine with corks
orbiting at different distances from the central spinning motor !
Of course the reality is different, since we are with the present full
scale system in a 3d configuration.

Now my next question to you is that considering the model described above
and its media which is water, through what media then would be in your view
impelled the motion ( axial and orbital ) to the planets . You must note of
course that in that 3d model all the said planets are spinning on the Sun
Equatorial Plane, demonstrating there some kind of centrifugal driving
force.
Do you have a idea what the said media could be, or do you refute the
existence of such media ?

Note : By the way, there has never been any Glaciations and if you care I
will explain that to you one day.

jp

~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~




<geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
1115642380.688679.200290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud wrote:
> Gerald,
>
> What could be, in your view, the motor behind that Earth axial and
orbital
> motions then ?
> Inertia ?
>
> This is just to clarify your position.
>
> --
> Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
> Australia Mining Pioneer
> Exploration Geologist
> Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre Mines
> The Great Sandy Desert of Australia
>
> Founder of the True Geology
>
> ~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~
>
>
>
>
>
> <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 1115550905.362240.300380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Don
> >
> "snip "

Hi John

The Newtonian application of terrestial ballistics to planetary motion
relies on a heliocentric cause for axial and orbital motion,he gets
rid of the difficulties of independent axial and independent orbital
motions by combining them into a single sidereal motion referenced off
the Earth's axis and this John is an extremely unethical maneuver.

http://www.pfm.howard.edu/astronomy/Chaisson/AT401/IMAGES/AACHCIR0.JPG

Having lost the true relationship between axial and orbital motion and
isolated everything to a heliocentric orbital cause,this seals the
fate of those who attribute everything to Newtonian 'gravitation and
its attendent vocabulary of inertia,angular momentum ect.There is
another way however to restore axial and orbital motions as independent
motions.

In order to make more sense of the changing relationship between axial
and orbital motion during an ice age (Milankovitch cycle) where the
orbit of a planet becomes more elliptical yet retains Kepler's second
law it is easier to graft in the motion of the solar system in one
direction as it moves around the galactic axis rather than hunt for
some heliocentric cause for the change in orbital geometry.It also
opens a far more productive ground for developmental geological
purposes because in the Newtonian system a stationary Earth is just as
valid as a moving Earth.

There is nothing unduly difficult in incorporating the solar system's
galactic orbital motion as an influence on planetary heliocentric
motion no more than it does incorporating the Earth's motions as a
factor in developmental geology,what may be more difficult is for men
to drop the Newtonian way of thinking or for those who are intimidated
once the words gravitation, inertia, angular momentum are
mentioned,after all this is where Newton cooked the books to get
terrestial ballistics fitted into planetary motion.

It is an enormous and intricate endeavor for people who can keep things
in flux and not retreat to the familiar cozy glow of Newtonian
ballistics (which is wrong anyway) but I assure anyone who is not
afraid to make a temporary mistake,the intuitive way is well worth the
initial effort.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Oriel -- Let me get your opinion
    ... to recognize other frames of reference for determining relative motion ... Walk in the orbit of the Earth with somebody else walking in the orbit ... stationary, nay, and sometimes retrograde. ... Understanding the theory of retrograde motion of the superior planets ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Newgrange and timekeeping
    ... original Copernican insight that the observed motion of the planets can ... be explained by an orbitally moving Earth. ... The Copernican notion was Ontologically less complicated and if one ...
    (soc.culture.irish)
  • Re: Next genuine advance in imaging astronomy
    ... doesn't depict the distance of stars at all. ... the Earth in resolving the observed behavior of the other planets - ... the constellational background as a gauge for planetary motion as did ... an immobile Earth at the center of the solar system and an orbitally ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
    ... Is the earth and all the planets revolving around the sun? ... Does any one know if Galileo did really say and write that the ... motion to explain the observed behavior of our planet along with the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: what has happened to people
    ... sidereal rotation periods of the planets are what is listed. ... in the case of Earth - is more relevant. ... But when he indicates it is empiricism he rejects, ... looking out at planetary motion from the Sun but rather - Eppur Si ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
Quantcast