Re: Plates and Equatorial bulge use same mechanism


geraldkelle...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> To John
>
> I would agree that presently the knowledge of cosmological formation
of
> galaxies,stars,planets and life on this planet is probably only in
its
> infancy rather than being in its final stage of completion and it is
> pretensious to fraudulent to present it otherwise.
>
> In the matter of Bulge and Plates and the shared mechanism for
both,
> most people would accept the sensible option and drop a stationary
> Earth/convection cells and just work differential rotation into
crustal
> motion without being concerned too much about how the Earth is broken
> into fractured divisions.
>
> Otoh,while there is no desperate need for a mechanism,the present one
> of convection cells is downright embarrasing yet for Grumbine and his
> cronies it is the greatest thing ever and worth defending.
>
> It is exactly a year since I started posting on the Earth'as motions
> after a guy tried to link Earthquakes with the observed position of
the
> Sun at dusk and dawn .One thing has changed over the past year,the
> parochial regulars here will never again publically reject the
> astronomical connections to terrestial geometry.Who knows John,they
> might even be arguing for these motions some day but they are like
> children who need the peer stamp of approval first.
>
> So,it is a matter of take it or leave it,Equatorial bulge and Plates
> with the same differential rotational mechanism in the semifluid
> layers below the crust or a stationary Earth/convection cells for in
> order for one to flourish as a concept the other has to go.
>
> I can do no more.

Never mind Gerald, ..we're almost there, ..We've actually got them to
the point of talking about the equatorial bulge of the Earth as being
something significant in its deformation. Would you believe that?
Anyone? A world full of scientists - and 'George'-like ones too, (..I
mean the cream of the cream,) .. and they are actually picking up on
the idea that this first order deformation of the Earth actually might
have something to do with its deformation.

But look at it.. Spin, bulge, deformation, deformation with twist/
torsion/ torque. And it's taken over a hundred years. Do you reckon
my estimate of a thousand is wide of the mark for the next step?
Namely expansion? It will never be seen until we have a mechanism?
Like the eclipse of the Moon, they're terrified of it, and will cringe
and cower until somebody steps forward and says: "It's all really dead
easy. It's just 'this-and-that'. Simple. " Whereupon those (them
sadists trigged out with bells an' whistles an' whips) who just love to
see people cower in fear, will promptly crucify him for spoiling their
pleasure.

Do we have to understand before we see? Or see before we understand?

What a mob. Mice. Lemmings. Sheep. Gorillas. Sharks. And 'George'.

.