Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- From: "Carsten Troelsgaard" <carsten.troelsgaard@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:10:58 +0200
<peba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i en meddelelse
news:1119019037.866918.303880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'm grappling with the origin of a peculiar "sandstone". Here are some
> photos and a macroscopic description:
>
> http://www.users.totalise.co.uk/~peba/sst1.jpg
> http://www.users.totalise.co.uk/~peba/sst2.jpg
> http://www.users.totalise.co.uk/~peba/sst3.jpg
>
> Characterised by a friable, fine-grained, homogeneous, creamy/beige
> matrix of quartz with randomly oriented, angular clasts of various
> lithologies and variable size that constitute less than 1% of the rock
> volume.
I've considered a couple of option that hasn't been mentioned, but I don't
think that it's at work: 1) Gypsum crystals in a desert/evaporitic
environment may form somewhat angular minerals that could be interpreted as
misplaced clasts. Naa. 2) A muddy deposit that's exposed to an increasing
salt-consentration may develope cracks and fractures (syneresis) that fills
with mineral precipitates. Naa.
The clasts look like they are allochthonous. I'm not very familiar with
fluvial structuring in desert-environments, where there is both an excess of
silty/sandy sized sediment, but foremost a general excess of sediment
compared to the run-off that occationally carries it.
> The colour of the matrix is locally red-brown, presumably due
> to infiltration by Fe-bearing fluid. The distribution of the clasts is
> highly variable. A very fine, barely discernible lamination was
> observed in the matrix at a couple of localities. Adjacent to small
> hydrothermal veins, the matrix is usually indurated (cemented) to a
> hard quartzite.
>
> Other possibly useful clues: the rock occurs in the Naboomspruit area
> of South Africa. it is believed to be part of the sedimentary Karoo
> package (140-300 Ma) that overlies and is faulted against the
> volcanosedimentary Rooiberg Group (2050 Ma). The Rooiberg Group is
> believed to represent the initial volcanism associated with the
> emplacement of the mighty Bushveld Complex.
>
> My problem is the randomly oriented, angular clasts in this otherwise
> homogeneously textured rock. How did they get there? When I first saw
> the rock, I dismissed a sedimentary origin and thought it might be some
> kind of tephra.
> And when I say friable, I mean the rock comes away as
> powder when you rub it - it doesn't break into small chunks.
It sounds like a somewhat immature sediment that lack precipitation to
forward the chemical processes to develope a through induration. That would
be consistent with the above comment.
Carsten
.
- References:
- Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- From: peba
- Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- Prev by Date: Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- Next by Date: Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- Previous by thread: Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- Next by thread: Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|