Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- From: Aidan Karley <doIlookDAFTenoughTOpost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:00:15 +0100
In article <42b881ae$0$275$edfadb0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Carsten Troelsgaard
wrote:
> You have thought it possible to be a volcaniclastic rock .. I take that the
> identification of the matrix as pure quartz-grains has some margin of
> uncertainty then?
>
That's a good point. Unless you can see cleavage facets on the hand
specimens, then you'll (sorry, Mr GReenstone) need to get those thin sections
cut.
--
Aidan Karley, FGS
Aberdeen, Scotland,
Location: 57°10'11" N, 02°08'43" W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233
.
- References:
- Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- From: peba
- Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- From: Mr Greenstone
- Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- From: Carsten Troelsgaard
- Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- Prev by Date: Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Cosmos Solar Sail Satellite launched
- Previous by thread: Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- Next by thread: Re: Loess, sandstone or tephra?
- Index(es):