Re: Article: A Cool Early Earth?
- From: "John Curtis" <john@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Oct 2005 15:03:20 -0700
Jo Schaper wrote:
> J. Taylor wrote:
> > Scientific American.com
> > September 26, 2005
> > A Cool Early Earth?
> >
> >
> > FULL ARTICLE:
> > http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=0005FA5D-5F7C-1333-9F7C83414B7F0000
> >
> > EXCERPT:
> >
> > The textbook view that the earth spent its first half a billion years
> > drenched in magma could be wrong. The surface may have cooled
> > quickly--with oceans, nascent continents and the opportunity for life
> > to form much earlier
>
> Define "Cool". I'm skeptical.
>
Probably 374 C, water's critical temperature, above which water can no
longer be liquified no matter how deep the ocean. Zircons
(zirconium silicates), like the rest of the silicates, are not
presolar.
Therefore, they had to originate in deep oceans, where most silicates
(basalts) are formed. John Curtis
.
- References:
- Article: A Cool Early Earth?
- From: J. Taylor
- Re: Article: A Cool Early Earth?
- From: Jo Schaper
- Article: A Cool Early Earth?
- Prev by Date: Re: 70,000 Australian scientists has rejected Intelligent Design
- Next by Date: Coloring Geologic Map Units With Photoshop
- Previous by thread: Re: Article: A Cool Early Earth?
- Next by thread: Re: Misleading information on how clean nuclear energy is
- Index(es):