Re: Energy-2


Alan wrote:


> Energy = Mass multiplied by the square of a constant, which is just another
> constant, c2 is just a mathematical expression, states that any system into
> which energy flows must be expanding.

Do you happen to know, Alan (since nobody else seems to want to be
talking to me), if there is discrimination the *quality* of space
within the atom from that outside of it? Do they consider the space
there the same, or different (from what's in between me and the spiral
galaxy, say)? And then how does that fit with concepts of relativity.
I mean if something has momentum and you multiply it with speed, then
that gives a lot of energy. But speed is relative, so it doesn't have
any at all (energy) relative to equal mass that's moving parallel. And
yet the atoms inside it are all moving like billy-o, whether it's
moving or not - so it's full of energy on that score (but not the
other). Have I got that right?


> The problem is that unless you have a "qualification" and "recognition" from
> whatever authority is in power your work gets ignored. They conveniently forget
> that when Einstein developed his theory he was just a patent office clark, and
> after he got famous he really didn't come up with much at all.

He was pretty lousy on his violin too, by all accounts


> The mother of Invention has always been Necessity. When you are a poor and lowly
> office clerk you are creative, but once you have become famous there are all
> these people praising you up and who hanging on every word you say, even if you
> were having a bad week and got it all wrong.

'Sright too. A qualification validates the person who asks for it, not
the person who has it. Mine's never done me much good. In fact from
time to time it's been a definite hindrance. ("Hwew d'yeEeww think
yeEeww aAAAre?") (= the war cry of the snivelling Nihilist..)

.

Relevant Pages

  • I have already implemented the specific relativity
    ... According to the theory of the specific relativity, the object moving ... energy is more intense than the primary object. ... compress about 1/10,000,000mm! ...
    (sci.physics)
  • I have already implemented the specific relativity
    ... According to the theory of the specific relativity, the object moving ... energy is more intense than the primary object. ... compress about 1/10,000,000mm! ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??
    ... >Which tells us how much the energy of the body CHANGES. ... >>H is the light energy of the body measured from the moving frame. ... >to the stationary frame is equal to the decrease in the kinetic energy ... >paper is based on conservation of energy and the Principle of Relativity. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??
    ... >Which tells us how much the energy of the body CHANGES. ... >>H is the light energy of the body measured from the moving frame. ... >to the stationary frame is equal to the decrease in the kinetic energy ... >paper is based on conservation of energy and the Principle of Relativity. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What is the total energy content of the Yellowstone caldera?
    ... > Alan wrote: ... >>>Can anyone quantify the total energy content of the Yellowstone caldera? ... >>>in the states of the western U.S., global energy consumption, etc? ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
Loading