Re: Findlay's Folly (was Re: plate tectonics and real science)
- From: Skywise <into@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 03:47:24 -0000
alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan) wrote nothing of consequence in
news:memo.20051112204703.1032B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
<Snipola>
> Let's put it bluntly shall we, Net Kop?
<Snipola>
Showing off your 'qualifications' again? You obviously
don't even umnderstand the meaning of the term.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Supernews sucks - blocking google, usenet.com & newsfeeds.com posts
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Findlay's Folly (was Re: plate tectonics and real science)
- From: Alan Johnson
- Re: Findlay's Folly (was Re: plate tectonics and real science)
- From: Alan
- Re: Findlay's Folly (was Re: plate tectonics and real science)
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Continental drift velocities?
- Next by Date: Re: ID update
- Previous by thread: Re: Findlay's Folly (was Re: plate tectonics and real science)
- Next by thread: Re: Findlay's Folly (was Re: plate tectonics and real science)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|