Re: Shrinking Earth

In article <dm2fmj$ht1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xyz@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Jean-Paul
Turcaud) wrote:

He walked into that one. LOL I forgot to mention that my Grandmother's name was
Smith, and when I was a kid I would always be in the forge watching my Uncle
John. Just about the only job I never tried in there was shoeing horses because
Uncle John screwed up one time and drove the nail in wrong and the horse kicked
him so he gave that up, and besides, all the farmers traded their horses in for
tractors as I grew up

> Very interesting your reference to your metallurgist background.
> I worked for sometimes as an analyst at a large Nickel smelter,
> (... while attending courses at the Kalgoorlie School of Mines ! )
>
> I am delighted to have found someone like you, who will understand the
> extend of the experimentations I have conducted on metal plates, relative to
> the understanding of the process of Surrection & Mountain Building. Such
> experimentation confirms definitively that the Orogenesis model proposed
> by the True Geology is correct !.
>
> Since you have carried out experimentations on metal ( tensile-stress
> testing, shear-stress testing, buckling-stress testing ) have you conducted
> by any chance experimentations on Punching and the deformation of that bud
> ( piece of metal for lack of better word ) which comes out of the hole when
> the punching tool goes through. I have done it in a nearby workshop and
> used plates up to 20 mm in thickness. ( I wish I had had the possibility of
> using larger tool & hence thicker metal plates )
> Anyway, here are my observations :
> 1) That part which comes up first is RAGGED and slightly HOLLOW as a
> syncline. Or in other words the lips of the bud are higher on the fringe
> than within the central part.
> 2) That part which comes up last is SMOOTH all round, and the material has
> been submitted then to evident metamorphism altering the metal structures.

That is true. Your reach a point where it is better to make a casting or to use
a drill.

> NOW when you observe mountains & especially mountains cliffs, you will note
> than :
>
> IN FACT
> All top parts of mountains are RAGGED, and this is not due to Erosion since
> erosion smoothen features (... .with the habitual mechanical erosions
> Georges has learnt by heart 1/2 a Century ago )
> All bottom parts of Mountains are SMOOTH with the original crystalline
> structure, when this is the case, completely metamorphosed to an amorphic
> structure :

This is true. I had completely missed thinking about that before.

> Can you see what it leads us to ?
>
> SIMPLY THAT THE WHOLE MOUNTAIN SURRECTION PROCESS IS A PUNCHING PROCESS !
> ... and as in any Punching Process, instantaneous at that, unless there is
> a matrix ! ... and in the case of the Earth Lithosphere, the matrix are the
> borders where it give up.
> ... from that point on, in the case that you agree, we may go further, for
> me to explain to you other aspects of the True Geology
>
> In the True Geology approach, the chaining of demonstration is self evident
> and based indeed on well known Engineering & Physics Principles
> ( Such plain & common sense reasoning which those fools of Oxford, Caltech,
> MIT & Harvard etc are completely unable to perceive )
>
> With best regards
>
>
> --
> Jean-Paul Turcaud
> Exploration Geologist
> Founder of the True Geology
>
> ~~ Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~


So that "mystery bulge" in Oregon that is linked in from my web-page, could in
fact be a mountain building exercise occurring as we speak? Oh, this will be
something to see. Hey, I am so glad I met you and Don. Chuckie Cagle always was
so hard to follow. He didn't believe me when I started agreeing with him.




Alan

http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/enigma.html

http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/
.