Re: Geology is a dangerous business


"Jo Schaper" <joschapern4ospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:11oc59akh63oh04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Alan wrote:
> > In article <11obud74aa60j3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > joschapern4ospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jo Schaper) wrote:
> >
> >
> >>http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/sciencemedicine/story/04CCC9
> >>EC44BB2EA6862570C2001C613A?OpenDocument
> >
> >
> > I'm not adding that to my Gulf Coast Blog and you would know why if you had seen
> > the latest article:
> >
> > http://unitedeuropeanworkersunion.blogspot.com/2005/11/mental-health-time-bomb-t
> > icking-away.html
> >
> > They are apparently already feeling somewhat suicidal, and I was trying to help
> > them. There is still one I have not heard from since Rita struck.
> >
>
> It's not the suicidal ones the geos should be worried about.


That's right, morality and decency isn't a part of your training
or vocabulary for that matter.


> Why should
> this man receive death threats for telling the geomorphological truth?


Oh my god, lets put a robe on him, anoint him with oils
and declare him a Geomorphological Saint.
Subsiding is a fact of geology Jo, concluding the city
should be abandoned is the act of a viscous opportunist.

He should have a geomorphological stick rammed up
his ass.



>
> OTOH, we had a 2.5 Eq 8 miles under East St. Louis the other day, and
> already entire banks of panic buttons are lit up. Go figure.
>


.

Quantcast