Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- From: "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:47:41 GMT
"Stuart" <bigdakine@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134344156.905257.286660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Alan wrote:
>> In article <1134265314.314077.315840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> don@xxxxxxxxxxxx (don findlay) wrote:
>>
>>
>> Actually Don, as you ask, for a very long time I have had this site
>> bookmarked.
>>
>> http://www.sentex.net/~tcc/siem.html
>>
>> Subcrustal Ice Earth Model
>>
>> What's Down Inside?
>> Could the earth contain a subcrustal ice layer? Jupiter's largest
>> satellites,
>> Ganymede, (diameter 5,262 km, density 1.94 gm/cm3), and Callisto,
>> (diameter
>> 4,800 km, density 1.86 gm/cm3) have water/ice mantles and rocky cores.
>> Ganymede's crust probably consists of a thick layer of water ice.
>>
>> The earth is unique in the solar system because of the presence of
>> liquid water
>> at the surface, and its high density core. The earth's atmosphere, also,
>> is
>> uniquely constituted for sustaining life. But evidence for ice and water
>> elsewhere naturally leads to the question, why couldn't the earth's
>> interior
>> also contain an ice layer? The Subcrustal Ice Earth Model (SIEM) is
>> being
>> developed to investigate this possibility.
>
> Not as Doug Cox envisions it.
>
> As was pointed out a number of years ago on talk.origins., Cox's model
> can't account for the observed seismic phase veolocities in the Earth.
> THats just the tip of the ice-berg ( No pun intended).
>
> Futhermore, there is a large difference between what Cox proposes (he
> is a young earth creationist) and what experimental petrologists
> propose. Cox is driven to find an explanation for something which never
> happened, the Noachian Deluge/
>
>>
>> According to the conventional theory of plate tectonics, water and other
>> materials from the earth's surface are recycled to the deep interior by
>> hypothetical processes of subduction and convection. The driving force
>> for the
>> postuated movements of the plates is mantle convection, a process
>> invoked by
>> Arthur Holmes as a mechanism for continental drift.
>>
>> The Inner Workings of the Earth by Michael Wysession, from American
>> Scientist,
>> March-April 1995 presents a discussion of current thinking about
>> mechanisms for
>> recycling water and other materials from the earth's surface to the deep
>> interior. According to the theory, some of this water returned to the
>> interior
>> by convection driven processes becomes ejected in volcanic eruptions.
>
>>
>> The convection hypothesis comes under critical scrutiny in: Is mantle
>> convection
>> no more than a storm in Arthur Holmes' porridge bowl? This author of
>> this
>> article [presumably Dr. Ken Duckworth, professor of geophysics at the
>> University
>> of Calgary], uses the pseudonym A.H.E.Retic. He tilts against "a concept
>> so
>> powerful that even today it has become a Mantra to be chanted by all
>> should they
>> ever hope to get a grant to study any aspect of the crustal behaviour of
>> the
>> earth". The article identifies several fatal flaws in the standard dogma
>> of
>> mantle convection, and develops some helpful Retic's Rules.
>>
>> Could the concept of recyling of water from the earth's hydrosphere back
>> into
>> the depths of earth, (needed for the conventional view of an ancient
>> earth,
>> billions of years old) be wrong? Thermodynamics suggests bodies that are
>> heating
>> up degass. The high concentration of radioactive isotopes in rocks could
>> mean
>> the earth is heating up. See The Heat of the Earth.
>
> THis seems to ignore the fact that the Earth's compliment of
> radioactive materials is diminishing through time.
>
>>
>> A 1995 paper by Lars Stixrude, Mineral physics of the mantle from
>> Reviews of
>> Geophysics considers possible mechanisms by which water and volatiles
>> could
>> exist deep in the earth's interior, combined with other minerals.
>> Stixrude notes
>> that 1% by weight water stored in the earth's mantle amounts to 30
>> hydrospheres.
>
> Lars has done some extraordianry work in that area.
>
> However, some of the claims above are bizarre. THe fact that the mantle
> may contain a component of water, makes convection more likely as a
> mechanism, not less.
>>
>> If the water and volatiles in the earth's interior are primeval, the
>> earth could
>> not be billions of years old!
>
> ?
>
> A laughable assertion.
>
> Stuart
Lol. If there is water deep within the earth, and it is "primeval" and the
earth is not, how did the water get into something that is younger than it
is? Do these guys ever think?
George
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- From: Stuart
- Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- References:
- Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- From: Alan
- Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- From: Stuart
- Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- Prev by Date: Re: Climate change theory barks up wrong tree, study shows
- Next by Date: Re: Climate change theory barks up wrong tree, study shows
- Previous by thread: Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- Next by thread: Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|