Re: A possible explanation for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather
- From: alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan)
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:55 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <1134193005.897349.150720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:
> I have posted a new website that explains the origin of Earth's
> magnetic field. You can find it at:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/earthmag.html
>
> I have included the text of the website here as well, but the web site
> includes the graphics used in the explanations.
>
> One of nature's unsolved mysteries is the origin of the Earth's
> magnetic field. Why does Earth have a magnetic field while other
> planets do not have a magnetic field? What keeps it going and what
> controls the field strength?
>
> A possible explanation for the origin of the Earth's magnetic field may
> be the atmosphere. The atmosphere generates a small but constant
> magnetic field which could then drive the larger magnetic field coming
> from the core. It has been observed that about 10% of the surface
> magnetic field may be due to processes in the Earth's atmosphere. From
> the web site:
>
> http://www.albany.edu/faculty/rgk/atm101/magnet.htm
>
> "The magnetic field at the surface of the Earth is largely determined
> by processes within Earth's core. The field generated by these
> processes is called the Main Field. However, about 10% of the surface
> magnetic field is due to processes in Earth's atmosphere. This
> contribution is called the External Field."
>
> Wind currents like the jet stream, generally moves from west to east,
> and we know that the earth has a large electric field and that charge
> separation happens in the cloud layers. The charged atmosphere could be
> considered a large conducting mass moving from west to east and may
> setup an initial weak magnetic field that helps jumpstart or regulate
> the field from the larger molten core.
>
> The way that this could work is that the upper atmosphere which
> contains the strong winds like the jet stream is ionized by incoming
> cosmic rays which gives the upper atmosphere a positive charge. If a
> positive charge is moved in a circle from west to east, it would
> generate the magnetic poles with the same polarity as we see them on
> Earth. This is in accordance with the known physical properties of
> charges.You would get the same effect if you swung a bag of positively
> charged ions around you in a counter-clockwise direction.
>
> If the magnetic field depends on the presence of the atmosphere to
> generate the initial magnetic field, this would make the very specific
> prediction that the strength of the magnetic field relies on the
> atmosphere and rotation.
>
> This predicts that no atmosphere means little magnetism and lots of
> moving atmosphere means a big magnetic field. I believe this holds true
> in the solar system. The moon and mercury have little atmosphere and
> little magnetic field. Mars also has much less atmosphere and magnetic
> field. Saturn and Jupiter have very large atmosphere and rotation and
> huge magnetic fields. Venus has lots of atmosphere, but very little
> rotation. This provides part of the explanation for why some planets
> have a magnetic field while some do not. See a chart of atmospheric
> pressure rotation and magnetic fields at:
>
> http://www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/plantblb.htm
>
> If you examine this chart, you will see that a thick atmosphere appears
> to be a requirement for a large magnetic field. However, an atmosphere
> alone does not guarantee that a planet will have a magnetic field.
> Venus is a notable exception and the winds are very high on Venus, so
> you would think that an atmosphereic magnetic field would be generated.
> In this case, I think a rotating molten core may also be required to
> generate a strong main field. Venus hardly has any rotation, so the
> core probably cannot sustain any field generated by the atmosphere.
>
> As further evidence of this hypothesis that the Earth magnetic field is
> caused by the movement of the atmosphere, look at the following graphic
> which shows how the Earth's magnetic field pattern appears to flow
> around the Earth over time.
>
> http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/pb2/pb23/Mag/Img-main/fig4-big.gif
>
> The Earth's magnetic field is not completely uniform. It forms pockets
> of magnetic pattern which appear to move across the face of the Earth
> over time. This graphic comes from the web site:
>
> http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/pb2/pb23/Mag/main.html
>
> This graphic shows a great deal of detail and shows that the magnetic
> field doesn't all flow in the same direction. Notably, if you look off
> the west coast of America, you can see a large counter-clockwise
> rotation in the map. You can also see other circular rotations to the
> right of Australia and above Antartica. If you examine this graphic, it
> would appear that the positions of the continents have an effect on the
> flow of magnetic pattern. How is it possible that a surface feature
> could have such a drastic effect on the magnetic field if it is
> generated far below the surface in the molten core. Now compare this
> with a map of surface winds.
>
> http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/images/surface_pres_wind_july.gi
> f
>
> This graphic was found at the the web site:
>
> http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7p.html
>
> If you compare these two maps of the Earth, they are not exactly the
> same, but they share some of the same characteristic circulation
> patterns due to the position of the continents. You can see similar
> circulation patterns in the Pacific ocean off the west coast of
> America. You also see curculation patterns off of Australia and in the
> Atlantic ocean.
>
> The wind direction on Earth changes greatly from season to season and I
> have only shown a chart of the weather patterns during July, so I
> wouldn't expect an exact match of the magnetic field movement with any
> particular wind speed map generated for a particular month. But I would
> predict that an overall average should come close to matching up with
> the magnetic field map.
>
> While the matchup that can be seen between the magnetic field movement
> and the wind speed is not exact, I think it is beyond coincidence that
> the Earth magnetic field map has some of the same circulation patterns
> and appears to be constrained by the position of the continents. This
> is evidence that the magnetic field is closely related to the
> atmospheric wind speed.
>
> One possible prediction of this theory is that the magnetic field
> should be tied to major climactic changes. If the direction of the
> winds were to be substantially reversed, we could see a reversal of the
> magnetic field. There is evidence to suggest that magnetic reversals do
> happen during periods of dramatic climate change. The following graphic
> shows a chart of the magnetic reversals over the past million years.
>
> http://www.iceagenow.com/MagneticReversalsAndGlaciation-1.jpg
>
> The yellow highlighted names are when ice ages coincided with a change
> in the magnetic field direction. There have been at least 12 ice ages
> related to magnetic reversals over the past million years.
>
> This graphic comes from:
> http://www.iceagenow.com/Magnetic_Reversal_Chart.htm
>
> In conclusion, the origin of the Earth's magnetic field may be
> triggered by the magnetic field created by the movement of air in the
> atmosphere. While this field might contribute only 10% of the observed
> field strength, it controls and modulates the other 90% of the main
> field strength and keeps it stable.
>
> This may explain the nature of magnetic reversals since magnetic
> reversals are often associated with the onset of ice ages. Radical
> changes in the Earth's weather patterns could make winds moving from
> East to West, dominate winds moving from West to East.
>
> It would not be particularly difficult for this to happen since winds
> normally run in both directions. It would just be a matter for the
> equatorial winds which normally run East to West to dominate the winds
> in the northern/southern hemispheres which normally run West to East.
> When the West to East winds dominate, a magnetic field reversal would
> occur.
>
> This theory is part of a larger Theory of Everything which can be found
> at:
> http://www.geocites.com/franklinhu/theory.html
>
> fhumag
Thank you. I have linked you in. There was once a time I made a very good living
out of being an "expert" in electro-magnetic fields" and I do agree with you. I
also see that you have links to http://www.iceagenow.com/ but I do fear that
nobody is listening as those snowstorms start hitting the North-Eastern U.S.A.
I do hope that poor Brian and co keep on laughing.
Alan
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/enigma.html
http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Geological doctorates
- Next by Date: Re: Scientists voice tsunami concern
- Previous by thread: New models for public access to scientific knowledge
- Next by thread: Teaching ID as religion is a dangerous affair
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|