Re: A possible explanation for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather



In article <1134193005.897349.150720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:

> I have posted a new website that explains the origin of Earth's
> magnetic field. You can find it at:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/earthmag.html
>
> I have included the text of the website here as well, but the web site
> includes the graphics used in the explanations.
>
> One of nature's unsolved mysteries is the origin of the Earth's
> magnetic field. Why does Earth have a magnetic field while other
> planets do not have a magnetic field? What keeps it going and what
> controls the field strength?
>
> A possible explanation for the origin of the Earth's magnetic field may
> be the atmosphere. The atmosphere generates a small but constant
> magnetic field which could then drive the larger magnetic field coming
> from the core. It has been observed that about 10% of the surface
> magnetic field may be due to processes in the Earth's atmosphere. From
> the web site:
>
> http://www.albany.edu/faculty/rgk/atm101/magnet.htm
>
> "The magnetic field at the surface of the Earth is largely determined
> by processes within Earth's core. The field generated by these
> processes is called the Main Field. However, about 10% of the surface
> magnetic field is due to processes in Earth's atmosphere. This
> contribution is called the External Field."
>
> Wind currents like the jet stream, generally moves from west to east,
> and we know that the earth has a large electric field and that charge
> separation happens in the cloud layers. The charged atmosphere could be
> considered a large conducting mass moving from west to east and may
> setup an initial weak magnetic field that helps jumpstart or regulate
> the field from the larger molten core.
>
> The way that this could work is that the upper atmosphere which
> contains the strong winds like the jet stream is ionized by incoming
> cosmic rays which gives the upper atmosphere a positive charge. If a
> positive charge is moved in a circle from west to east, it would
> generate the magnetic poles with the same polarity as we see them on
> Earth. This is in accordance with the known physical properties of
> charges.You would get the same effect if you swung a bag of positively
> charged ions around you in a counter-clockwise direction.
>
> If the magnetic field depends on the presence of the atmosphere to
> generate the initial magnetic field, this would make the very specific
> prediction that the strength of the magnetic field relies on the
> atmosphere and rotation.
>
> This predicts that no atmosphere means little magnetism and lots of
> moving atmosphere means a big magnetic field. I believe this holds true
> in the solar system. The moon and mercury have little atmosphere and
> little magnetic field. Mars also has much less atmosphere and magnetic
> field. Saturn and Jupiter have very large atmosphere and rotation and
> huge magnetic fields. Venus has lots of atmosphere, but very little
> rotation. This provides part of the explanation for why some planets
> have a magnetic field while some do not. See a chart of atmospheric
> pressure rotation and magnetic fields at:
>
> http://www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/plantblb.htm
>
> If you examine this chart, you will see that a thick atmosphere appears
> to be a requirement for a large magnetic field. However, an atmosphere
> alone does not guarantee that a planet will have a magnetic field.
> Venus is a notable exception and the winds are very high on Venus, so
> you would think that an atmosphereic magnetic field would be generated.
> In this case, I think a rotating molten core may also be required to
> generate a strong main field. Venus hardly has any rotation, so the
> core probably cannot sustain any field generated by the atmosphere.
>
> As further evidence of this hypothesis that the Earth magnetic field is
> caused by the movement of the atmosphere, look at the following graphic
> which shows how the Earth's magnetic field pattern appears to flow
> around the Earth over time.
>
> http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/pb2/pb23/Mag/Img-main/fig4-big.gif
>
> The Earth's magnetic field is not completely uniform. It forms pockets
> of magnetic pattern which appear to move across the face of the Earth
> over time. This graphic comes from the web site:
>
> http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/pb2/pb23/Mag/main.html
>
> This graphic shows a great deal of detail and shows that the magnetic
> field doesn't all flow in the same direction. Notably, if you look off
> the west coast of America, you can see a large counter-clockwise
> rotation in the map. You can also see other circular rotations to the
> right of Australia and above Antartica. If you examine this graphic, it
> would appear that the positions of the continents have an effect on the
> flow of magnetic pattern. How is it possible that a surface feature
> could have such a drastic effect on the magnetic field if it is
> generated far below the surface in the molten core. Now compare this
> with a map of surface winds.
>
> http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/images/surface_pres_wind_july.gi
> f
>
> This graphic was found at the the web site:
>
> http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7p.html
>
> If you compare these two maps of the Earth, they are not exactly the
> same, but they share some of the same characteristic circulation
> patterns due to the position of the continents. You can see similar
> circulation patterns in the Pacific ocean off the west coast of
> America. You also see curculation patterns off of Australia and in the
> Atlantic ocean.
>
> The wind direction on Earth changes greatly from season to season and I
> have only shown a chart of the weather patterns during July, so I
> wouldn't expect an exact match of the magnetic field movement with any
> particular wind speed map generated for a particular month. But I would
> predict that an overall average should come close to matching up with
> the magnetic field map.
>
> While the matchup that can be seen between the magnetic field movement
> and the wind speed is not exact, I think it is beyond coincidence that
> the Earth magnetic field map has some of the same circulation patterns
> and appears to be constrained by the position of the continents. This
> is evidence that the magnetic field is closely related to the
> atmospheric wind speed.
>
> One possible prediction of this theory is that the magnetic field
> should be tied to major climactic changes. If the direction of the
> winds were to be substantially reversed, we could see a reversal of the
> magnetic field. There is evidence to suggest that magnetic reversals do
> happen during periods of dramatic climate change. The following graphic
> shows a chart of the magnetic reversals over the past million years.
>
> http://www.iceagenow.com/MagneticReversalsAndGlaciation-1.jpg
>
> The yellow highlighted names are when ice ages coincided with a change
> in the magnetic field direction. There have been at least 12 ice ages
> related to magnetic reversals over the past million years.
>
> This graphic comes from:
> http://www.iceagenow.com/Magnetic_Reversal_Chart.htm
>
> In conclusion, the origin of the Earth's magnetic field may be
> triggered by the magnetic field created by the movement of air in the
> atmosphere. While this field might contribute only 10% of the observed
> field strength, it controls and modulates the other 90% of the main
> field strength and keeps it stable.
>
> This may explain the nature of magnetic reversals since magnetic
> reversals are often associated with the onset of ice ages. Radical
> changes in the Earth's weather patterns could make winds moving from
> East to West, dominate winds moving from West to East.
>
> It would not be particularly difficult for this to happen since winds
> normally run in both directions. It would just be a matter for the
> equatorial winds which normally run East to West to dominate the winds
> in the northern/southern hemispheres which normally run West to East.
> When the West to East winds dominate, a magnetic field reversal would
> occur.
>
> This theory is part of a larger Theory of Everything which can be found
> at:
> http://www.geocites.com/franklinhu/theory.html
>
> fhumag

Thank you. I have linked you in. There was once a time I made a very good living
out of being an "expert" in electro-magnetic fields" and I do agree with you. I
also see that you have links to http://www.iceagenow.com/ but I do fear that
nobody is listening as those snowstorms start hitting the North-Eastern U.S.A.

I do hope that poor Brian and co keep on laughing.

Alan

http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/enigma.html

http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Plate techtonics and asteroid hits
    ... earth radius to 1.5Bya, but allows some folding may have occurred. ... Except you failed to calculate the correct escape velocity. ... atmosphere, and we KNOW that it in fact did. ... of a molten core (and the regeneration of a magnetic field). ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Antenna in the Air.
    ... caught in a "conduit" in the atmosphere and flow around the globe. ... and coalesces into layers during the day and the layers later dissipate. ... Radio signals are bent by the ionised layers and emerge from the layers at ... magnetic field will distribute particles charged one way or another. ...
    (rec.radio.shortwave)
  • Re: International Spacecraft Reveals Detailed Processes on the Sun (Hinode)
    ... show the sun's magnetic field is much more turbulent and dynamic than ... Hinode, Japanese for "sunrise," was launched Sept. 23, 2006, to study ... through the different layers of the solar atmosphere. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: what if Earth and Mars were reversed in orbits?
    ... Earth rotated in Mars' actual orbit, and Mars rotated in the actual ... Mars is still too small to hold onto its atmosphere; and the lack of rotational difference between its core and its outer layers, means that there is no Martian magnetic radiation shield. ... Venus is big enough to hold onto its atmosphere like Earth, but also doesn't have a magnetic field like Mars, so its atmosphere is constantly bombarded by cosmic rays and the leftover particles have turned it into a greenhouse nightmare. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: aurora & losing magnetic field
    ... | I have had interest in aurora borealis for some time. ... | of loss of magnetic field, lethal depletion of Earth's atmosphere ... reversals in the earth's history and the planet is still teeming with life ...
    (sci.geo.meteorology)