Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weath
- From: alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan)
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:00 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <1134283344.545572.209110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:
>
> DaveL wrote:
> > I read your theory of everything. Most of it sounds good. But what about
> > aether being composed of proton-electron pairs? Isn't that H1? So the
> > aether is simple hydrogen? You lost me there. I can see the aether made of
> > something that has charge but not mass.
> >
> > DaveL
>
> Actually, I think the proton/electron bond is closer to what we see in
> a neutron instead of hydrogen. It is possible that the neutron,
> neutrino, and the aether particle are in fact the same thing.
>
> The main objection to the neutron being the aether particle is that it
> decays in a matter of minutes. However, this is only when it is free
> from any containment like an atom. Within an atom, a neutron can last
> forever. You wouldn't say that a neutron could not be part of an atom
> because it decays in minutes. When a neutron is part of the aether
> matrix, it is bound just like it is in the atom, so it probably doesn't
> decay and it displays properties which are radically different from the
> 'free' neutrons we see coming out of nuclear reactions.
>
> So the aether particle is not hydrogen H1 which is weakly bound by only
> the electrostatic force. I don't know exactly what binds neutrons or
> aether particles together, but it is probably of a mechanical nature
> and stronger than the electrostatic force.
>
> Since the aether is composed of electrons/protons, I would say that the
> aether does have mass. In fact, some calculations by others put the
> mass as being a million times denser than steel. This density accounts
> for the how quickly waves propagate in such a dense material. Sound
> waves travel faster in denser material. The speed of light is actually
> just the speed of sound though the aether material. I'm not sure, but
> this incredibly high mass might account for 'dark matter' which is
> presumed to exist in the universe.
That is what I think too about the speed of light. You simply can not have a
wave motion in nothing; it makes no sense. For a wave to exist it has to be
waving through some kind of medium.
Alan
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/enigma.html
http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/
.
- Prev by Date: Re: A KIND ADVICE
- Next by Date: Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- Previous by thread: Re: A KIND ADVICE
- Next by thread: Earthquake season?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|