Re: A General Introduction to the Expanding Earth


George wrote:
> "jonathan" <write@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:rM7pf.788$k76.402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/8098/1.htm#Top
> >
>
> Old news. Very old news. Very very old news. It's so old, the mold on it
> has sprouted legs. If it was any older, we'd have to contuct
> potasium-argon dating on it. Having said that, it's good to see that kooks
> can find each other. Everyone needs a friend, even if it is an imaginary
> one sitting in a corner knitting facts that aren't there. By the way, I
> was going to provide you with a link to the same guy discussing "biblical
> geology, but it looks like they were embarrassed about that page, and took
> it down. Oh, and my former paleontology professor studied for a time under
> Carey down in Tasmania, and he says that these guys are full of *** when
> they claim that Carey dismissed plate tectonics. In fact, in remarks
> published in his memoirs in 2002, he says that Carey was a plate tectonics
> pioneer. And one of his "references" claims to be a PhD. Yet I found out
> that he only has a master's degree - in Engineering.
>
> George
>

Ford used to be a regular here.

Ford also used to claim that "imaginary numbers weren't real".

We are talking real entertainment..

Stuart
> The great tragedy of science -- the
> slaying of a beautiful hypothesis
> by an ugly fact. - Thomas Huxley

.