Re: Gas Explosion Shakes Texas
- From: Skywise <into@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:23:28 -0000
alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan) wrote in
news:memo.20051219115149.736C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
<Snipola>
> Let's put it this way, shall we? I used to work for a certain British
> petrochemical giant in South Africa. On site, and it was my
> responsibility to maintain it, was a foam plant capable of generating
> any fire that occurred.
Why would a petro plant have a "foam plant" for "generating any fire"?
You should proofread your frothing at the mouth posts lest you look
like the fool you are.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Like censorship and not getting support help? Switch to Supernews!
They won't even answer questions through your ISP!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gas Explosion Shakes Texas
- From: Charani
- Re: Gas Explosion Shakes Texas
- From: Alan
- Re: Gas Explosion Shakes Texas
- References:
- Re: Gas Explosion Shakes Texas
- From: Charani
- Re: Gas Explosion Shakes Texas
- From: Alan
- Re: Gas Explosion Shakes Texas
- Prev by Date: Re: heat corpuscles in the mantle
- Next by Date: Re: A General Introduction to the Expanding Earth
- Previous by thread: Re: Gas Explosion Shakes Texas
- Next by thread: Re: Gas Explosion Shakes Texas
- Index(es):