Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- From: "John Kepler" <jekepler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:05:10 -0500
> We're not the ones with our underwear tied up, Mr. Kepler. I am very
> skeptical that MSHA has the sort of technology I am referring to.
I suggest you look up Biomarine Engineering's "Biopak 240", and then Drager
Safety's "BG-4AP"....these are the two units that meet the MSHA spec
for SCBA Mine Self-Rescue Apparatus. While you're at it, you can also check
out MSA's W65 mine self-rescuer.
BTW Ms. Shaper....would you like my MSHA Mine Safety Certification number?
John
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- From: Jo Schaper
- Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- References:
- Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- From: Alan
- Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- From: Jo Schaper
- Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- From: George
- Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- From: Jo Schaper
- Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- From: George
- Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- From: John Kepler
- Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- From: Jo Schaper
- Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- Prev by Date: Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- Next by Date: Evolutionists, please answer this
- Previous by thread: Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- Next by thread: Re: Mine Safety Subordinated to Mining Company Interests
- Index(es):
Loading