Re: Top Nasa climate scientist 'censored'
- From: "don findlay" <don@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jan 2006 17:39:04 -0800
Stuart wrote:
>
> First of all, as a government employed scientist, I can tell you that
> in general you do not have the right to speak for Uncle Sam without
> getting approval.
>
> However, there is no law against giving your own personal opinion, so
> long as you make it clear that it is your own personal opinion and it
> doesn't involve classified information.
>
> Having said that, that doesn't mean the gov isn't without its own
> recourses, it might be a while before you get a promotion etc.
>
> Stuart
Real science and real scientists in action, eh, Stuart...
(Stuart in slow-mo to the big questions re what science is, ..who
scientists are, ..and academic fraud.. ) Go it, man, ... go it.
Tell us more. ( "Delamination", ..and doesn't it f'ing hurt) . We
understand the scientific bit about careers and promotion, ..what's the
'etc' you mention?
(Hey, Stu, ..Big Samkin is watching you. Be careful now. )
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Top Nasa climate scientist 'censored'
- From: Stuart
- Re: Top Nasa climate scientist 'censored'
- References:
- Re: Top Nasa climate scientist 'censored'
- From: Jo Schaper
- Re: Top Nasa climate scientist 'censored'
- From: Alan
- Re: Top Nasa climate scientist 'censored'
- From: Stuart
- Re: Top Nasa climate scientist 'censored'
- Prev by Date: Re: Why George is the Dumbest Geologist on the Planet
- Next by Date: Re: Why George is the Dumbest Geologist on the Planet
- Previous by thread: Re: Top Nasa climate scientist 'censored'
- Next by thread: Re: Top Nasa climate scientist 'censored'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|