Re: "AGHARTHA", INSIDE Our HOLLOW Earth
- From: alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan)
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:10 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <dr2ev1dmda9kigplfa40qo2isl0nkhc569@xxxxxxx>, Looky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(DrPostman) wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:39:06 +1100, "Carole" <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
in accordance with The Prophecy scribed:
We are not amused.
Says the voices in your head.
And you are way off beam as apparently seismic studies prove zilch.
Says the voices in your head.
Mysteries of the Inner Earth
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/DP5/inner2.htm#s1
David Pratt
May 2001
"Seismic data alone cannot determine whether the earth is solid or hollow,
because they cannot be interpreted without making certain fundamental
assumptions. As indicated in part 1, the conventional assumptions about
gravitational acceleration, density, and pressure within the earth are open
to doubt. It is therefore possible that seismic waves follow different paths
and have different velocities than scientists think, and that the standard
earth model is far removed from reality."
But you ignore the interdisciplinary work that is involved, something
you kooks never understand.
What a stupid comment. How do you know what anybody understands? You're like the
other spinmeisters, George, Stu et al, who don't seem to understand that we
already know the stuff they love to spout at us, and have found other
explanations worthy of consideration since. You are the dull and ignorant.
Please stop projecting *your* *problem* onto others.
Alan
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/enigma.html
http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/
http://www.bushflash.com/pl_lo.html
.
- Prev by Date: Re: REPLY BY SIR TURCAUD
- Next by Date: Re: Trilobite handedness
- Previous by thread: Re: "AGHARTHA", INSIDE Our HOLLOW Earth
- Next by thread: (not an ad) A Question of Jobs in the Earth Sciences
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
