Re: Volcano Questions
- From: "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 13:25:37 GMT
"Daniel Platt" <DanP57@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kLrSf.1903$ff5.552@xxxxxxxxxxx
William Oertell wrote:
"SBC Yahoo" <atilla.the.hun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hyDRf.56496$Jd.21888@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"SBC Yahoo" <atilla.the.hun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageand
news:A00Qf.74702$PL5.2498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Magma feeding the volcano's magma chamber comes from the highly
pressurized outer core, which is a liquid composed of metals and
reduced
silicon. The pressure is resultant of the burden above the outer core
resistance,the force of gravity, I believe. Pressure acts in 360 degrees, so the
liquid material in the outer core will find the point of least
plate,and begin to migrate out of the outer core towards the surface. When
it
erupts onto the surface of either a continental plate or a oceanic
makingit becomes a volcano, spitting out lava. The process of the magma
earthquakesit's way towards the surface along conduits like faults, fissures,
etc.
will cause tectonic activity, by the magma placing force on existing
plates/structures already in some stressful situation, due to existing
tectonic activity. This results in earthquakes, which is why
chamberor seismic events proceed most (if not all) volcanic eruptions.
Not all volcanoes explode onto the surface, some just ooze or flow
out,
after breaking through the surface. Some blow a small chunk of the
mountain away and then just flow lava down the sides of the mountain.
What causes a volcano to explode in a massive, violent eruption,
sending
million of tons of debris into the air? Does magma build up in a
are(magma chamber) until some event triggers a explosive eruption?
And further, it appears to me that as billions of cubic feet of magma
crustsdischarged from the outer core, that those continental and oceanic
holebeing assimilated into the mantle would in turn cause some of the
mantle
to be assimilated into the outer core, since there must be a material
balance, mass is not being created in the core, and it is not a empty
outerafter discharging magma. I would think the material balance of the
thecore has remained relatively the same for most of the 4.7 billion
years
the planet has been here, which means something must replace what is
belched out in volcanoes over the years. Gravity would tend to cause
core,dense metals (nickel, iron cobalt, etc.) to be drawn into the outer
linealong with other material "along for the ride".After looking at the USGS map of volcanoes in the western US, they all
up in a line parallel to the pacific coast and the pacific plate, whereLet's not forget Hawaii and Yellowstone.
it
interacts with the oceanic plate. I suppose conventional volcano
theory
would explain why there are no volcanoes in Kansas.
Has any volcano been found away from interacting plate zones (difficult
to
explain using the conventional theories)? For instance in someplace
like
Kansas where the nearest plate is on the dinner table, or perhaps on
the
seafloor, nowhere near interacting plates?
OK -- time to hijack thread.
I've noted that Yellowstone, Long Valley, Valles, Fish Canyon Tuff/La
Garita, San Juan Mountains, etc, are all examples of humongous volcanic
systems that have not been associated with continental subduction. I've
gotten a kick out of simply trying to identify some of these features
using "Google Earth."
One such system is between Butte and Helena, MT. When playing with
Google Earth, I noticed a large oval feature roughly 150mi x 250 mi, that
is bounded by the Big Belt Mountains, Beaverhead and Sapphire Mountains
(next to Bitteroots), with long axis running from Missoula through Butte
down to Yellowstone. If you back up to about 600mi on the display, you
see the oval quite clearly -- it fills up the whole sw corner of Montana.
The shape seems to strongly suggest an oval, but its orogeny may not all
be volcanic -- I'm curious if anybody can explain this to me?
Dan
Didn't you post this elsewhere? And wasn't the answer that what you are
referring to is mostly pre-Cambrian? I seem to recall that that was the
case. Correct me if I'm mistaken.
George
.
- References:
- Volcano Questions
- From: SBC Yahoo
- Re: Volcano Questions
- From: SBC Yahoo
- Re: Volcano Questions
- From: William Oertell
- Re: Volcano Questions
- From: Daniel Platt
- Volcano Questions
- Prev by Date: Re: New geosciences model explains ocean formation
- Next by Date: Re: Mars Exploration Rovers Update - March 11, 2006
- Previous by thread: Re: Volcano Questions
- Next by thread: Re: Volcano Questions
- Index(es):