Re: Does Kamchatka belong to North America?


Aidan Karley wrote:

(http://pangea.stanford.edu/research/structure/nerussia/index.html).

There you go everybody:- One for the Prediction. ( I'd forgotten about
that one.) I'll need to stick it on my "tracking the Progress page".
http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.geo.geology/search?group=sci.geo.geology&q=%22A+little+parcel+of+used+images%22&qt_g=1&searchnow=Search+this+group

Of course, Aidan's got all this killfiled because nobody is supposed to
get in front of this consensus machine. It's just plain 'Not Science'
, when sumbdy knows where it's going. Isn't that right? It's
supposed to wander about hither and thither, raising questions here and
questions there (for more research)

Anybody?

See, Aidan? Yours is not the only way of killing a file. Predict it.
Then nobody's got anything to talk about. This is why nobody is
answering any questions on Plate Tectonics, isn't it, ..It's a dead
file, ..killed by prediction. (I wonder if Aidan will post one on
sand grains now.) ...What about the Namib Desert and why it's where it
is? It's full of sand grains.... Maybe if we gather the data, and
look at them, ..down a microscope, ..one by one and not missing any so
we get a complete data set, and make frequency distribution plots and
divide by some number, just because, it will help. What? Do you
think Aidan?

Jeez it's a real pain, finding the answer. Not finding it is so much
more fun for people.

.