Re: Expanding Earth Video
- From: " George" <George@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 06:11:48 -0400
"Aidan Karley" <doIlookDAFTenoughTOpost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message
news:VA.00000e2c.1024609f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <VA.00000e18.1a4032e9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Aidan
Karley wrote:
it'll take a while. But I've got a weekend's news to catch up on in theWent through the first half-hour and there are several points that
mean time.) and see just how kookish the boy is.
stand out, which are identical
to Don's maunderings, and his lack of answers :
- There is no hint as to what physical process has lead to the
increase in volume of the Earth
that is required by his theory;
- He constantly decries the occurrence of subduction, without once
addressing the geological
reasons for believing it to be happening now (fault plane solutions, high
pressure-gradient metamorphic
suites.
- Powerpoint is as much a problem for him as for anyone else.
- The first 30 minutes he does little but replay various sets of
animations from his "Masters
Thesis". If that was the whole content of his thesis I'd be asking who
considered this unsupported
muttering to be of a passable quality.
Why does he go for, specifically, an exponential rate of expansion?
35 minutes - "gravitational collapse of crust". Strange name for
the flattening of the curvature
of segments of crust as the earth expands. That's a geometric necessity.
Ah - he uses this to provide a
reason for intracratonic extension - indeed he runs it into claiming that
the Red Sea is an example of
this collapse process, and not an ocean basin developing.
42 minutes and he appears to be claiming that intra-cratonic
extension was the expression of
earth expansion in that period. So from the Permian back to the
Mesoproterozoic he goes around closing
intracratonic basins to accommodate his shrinking Earth. Still no
explanation of where he gets his
material from. No explanation of why the "EE-tectonic" style changed at
around the start of the
Mesozoic.
Now, why is he stressing that the Atlantic-Indian and Pacific
oceans were (in his
reconstructions) separate and possibly had different salinities and
faunas ... Oh, he sees the draining
of one ocean into another as being a cause for mass extinctions. Water
running uphill? Or ocean's worth
of salt deposition? Conflicting data I leave as an exercise for the
reader.
I'll have to watch the 3rd third of it tomorrow.
Has don exploded yet? Did anyone get hit in the killfile by the
shrapnel?
--
Aidan Karley, FGS
Aberdeen, Scotland,
Location: 57°10'11" N, 02°08'43" W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233
You were braver than I. I watched about 25 minutes of it before I deleted
the entire file off my computer. Yes, his rant has the same problem that
all other proponents of this hypothesis have, as you describe above. Which
is why I completely lost interest and just axed the file. I don't know if
Don's head has committed suicide yet. I suspect it will, but hopefully
I'll never see the ugly results.
George
.
- References:
- Expanding Earth Video
- From: DinoX
- Re: Expanding Earth Video
- From: George
- Re: Expanding Earth Video
- From: Aidan Karley
- Re: Expanding Earth Video
- From: Aidan Karley
- Expanding Earth Video
- Prev by Date: Re: Estimating water quality
- Next by Date: Re: Expanding Earth Video
- Previous by thread: Re: Expanding Earth Video
- Next by thread: Re: Expanding Earth Video
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|