Erosional rates
- From: "Eigenvector" <m44_master@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:18:45 -0700
Question for the geologists here.
Is the rate of erosion greater or lesser or equal to the rate of build?
Let me qualify that in my terms. When I look at the shoreline, the
mountains, and such I consider the shoreline to be the zero plane of usable
land. So when I look at the mountains and hills and such I wonder if the
speed at which they are produced is greater than the speed at which rain,
wind, and gravity wear them down. I don't mean a specific hill or mountain,
but ALL hills and mountains - one might get ground down in Asia only to be
built up in Africa for instance. Obviously I'm using generalizations here,
so ultimately my question is - is the earth fated to be a flat ocean or can
plate techtonics keep up?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Erosional rates
- From: rjtrembgeologist
- Re: Erosional rates
- From: rjtrembgeologist
- Re: Erosional rates
- From: =?x-user-defined?q?=AB?= Paul =?x-user-defined?q?=BB?=
- Re: Erosional rates
- From: Jo Schaper
- Re: Erosional rates
- From: Aidan Karley
- Re: Erosional rates
- From: J.F. Cornwall
- Re: Erosional rates
- From: Carsten Troelsgaard
- Re: Erosional rates
- From: George
- Re: Erosional rates
- Prev by Date: Ping: Aiden, Jo, and anyone else interested in caves
- Next by Date: Re: Aiden, Jo, and anyone else interested in caves
- Previous by thread: Ping: Aiden, Jo, and anyone else interested in caves
- Next by thread: Re: Erosional rates
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|