Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered
- From: s_k_y_bolt99@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Charles Cagle)
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:55:04 -0700
In article <1148615720.873213.125470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Stuart" <bigdakine@xxxxxxx> wrote:
don findlay wrote:
Alan Johnson wrote:
"With our new techniques we were able to determine the shear velocity of
this material," stated Wendy Mao. "We were amazed that adding iron
dramatically slowed the velocities to levels that seismologists have
observed in the ultralow velocity zones. Iron-rich post-perosvkite,
formed by reactions between the mantle and the core, could be what these
thin, patchy regions are made of."
In addition to offering an alternative explanation to partial melting of
the ultralow velocity zones, the dense material would sink instead of
rising with the convection at hot spots. This behavior would explain why
these zones are clumped and not uniformly distributed and why the clumps
are associated with the hot spots and contribute to the volcanic
activity at the surface.
So what's their answer why we get a magnetic field, if it's not liquid?
(Just wondering) (and why is the point not mentioned.)
The outer core is liquid, and that is where the geomagnetic field is
generated. THat doesn't need to mentioned, because anyone with the
faintest knowledge of Earth strucutre knows that.
You've only been told this a dozen times.
Stuart
Maybe you're right, Stuart. People with the *faintest knowledge* of
Earth structure would typically know things that aren't true much like a
person with the faintest knowledge of basic physics would know that the
lithosphere, against all principles of physics related to bouyancy, can
descend down in subduction zones.
The geomagnetic field of the Earth is not generated by the Earth nor by
any components of the Earth. We only need look at Neptune and Uranus
whose magnetic fields are both off center from the rotational axis of the
planet by about a third of the planet's radius. Uranus and Neptune
testify that their magnetospheres are not related to the spin of the
planet, having 60 and 47 degrees respectively planet axis tilt with
respect to magnetic axis. And as I pointed out...they are not in the
center of the planet. Consider Mercury which doesn't spin fast enough to
generate a field (according to current dynamo theories) but has a healthy
one anyway (which incidently is 1/3 displaced from the physical center of
the planet). Even the Earth's field is not aligned with the spin axis of
the planet. It would be nice if people who are supposed to be
representative of some degree of knowledge of the internal workings of our
planet actually had some real knowledge instead of pseudoknowledge.
Gary A. Glatzmaier and Paul H. Roberts have been well criticized for
using completely unrealistic parameter numbers in their numerical
simulations of the Earth's posited geodynamo...yet they continue to plug
away as if there was somehow a connection between their completely
nonsensical idea that a planet generates its own magnetic field and
reality. The real solution is that the geomagnetic field can be modeled
in the the ideal as a standing wave boson structure... basically a Del X E
vector field in the ideal that must display the properties of a magnetic
dipole (the secondary vectors are H and poloidal) that periodically can be
stimulated in a mode change to the Del X H vector field mode that should
then display the characteristics of a large scale electric dipole (its
secondary vectors that are poloidal are E). We can and have made such
structures like this in the laboratory. They have unusually long
lifetimes even in an extremely electromagnetically chaotic environment
because physically they are global structures that are connected to the
entire universe.
The unit charge of an elementary charged particle can be shown to be
composed of a finite number of discrete subcomponents that are really just
dynamic (changing) one dimensional relationships - so that an electron,
for example, is shown to be a bundle of relationships and that those
relationships and how they are changing in magnitude in time determines
what we call the position of the electron with respect to all other quanta
in the universe. Since any closed loop flux loop can be reduced to a
charge and its conjugate in superposition then one can treat even a large
scale flux loop structure as if it were a quantum object that is globally
connected to the rest of the universe. Such a structure is absolutely
consistent with Noether's Theorem because it is globally symmetric and
hence also perfectly conservative. Its driving engine is the motion of
the entire universe. And its structure, when in the Del X H vector field
mode, is stimulated into producing geometric copies of itself at the
quantum scale at or near the inner equator of the flux torus. Those
copies happen to be the same as neutrons. This is the universe's process
of introducing new matter into the cosmos. Seriously if you look at the
Herbig-Haro object known as HH30 you can see that it is busy creating huge
amounts of new mass right in front of the eyes of astrophysicists and
cosmologists but they simply cannot wrap their brain around the reality
that the universe has an ex nihilo process for the creation of mass by the
simple process of introducing new geometry into the universe. It is
pretty arrogant of the physics community to deny that the universe has a
mechanism for the ex nihilo creation of new matter when they really don't
understand either the nature of mass nor of charge nor do they have a clue
as to the nature of a gravitational field.
Anyway, along the toroidal axis of such a large scale flux torus is its
gravitational terminus. The effect of that gravitational terminus loop is
that it produces a strong charge separation effect. This is really
because a gravitational field is a time rate gradient structure with the
time rate maximally retarded at the terminus. It is trivial to show that
elementary charged particles that are overlapping in the same momentum
space will behave opposite to the expectation of Coulomb's law and the
effect of a strong gravitational field is that it reduces the time rate in
the region of the gravitational terminus and this means that the relative
velocities of particles near the terminus will approach zero (with respect
to any outside observer) and since their de Broglie wavelength becomes
anomalously large as v approaches zero then the particles in the near
region of the gravitational terminus will overlap in the same momentum
space. Hence electrons will be excluded from the gravitational terminus
and only protons and neutrons will accumulate along that terminus loop.
Planets grow... and they grow because they create their own mass in their
cores. And perhaps the best direction that I could point you to would be
to direct you to http://www.nealadams.com/nmu.html Run the videos ...run
all of them and you'll see that there's ample evidence to show that not
just the Earth has grown substantially but also Europa, Ganymede,
Enceladus, Mars, but also even the Earth's Moon. You should have a high
speed connection and you need QuickTime installed. Planets grow
periodically. Now you know how and why. And you should know that the
magnetic field of a planet is not generated by the planet itself but
rather the other way around... The field creates the mass that becomes the
planet. People like Stuart don't really want you to know this... it
isn't that they know it but rather that they have gone to extraordinary
measures of self deception to avoid learning the truth. Stuart has
demonstrated again and again over the years that he believes that 'Truth'
is based upon consensus instead of being completely independent of
consensus. He must hysterically maintain that stance because otherwise
his stock in trade (meaning the pseudoknowledge that he belittles people
for not swallowing) will be shown to be without redeeming value and that
would mean that Stuart has wasted his life on nonsense and Stuart simply
cannot face that as a fact. But please folks, don't hate Stuart... I'm
not certain that he can actually help himself.
CC.
--
for email delete underscores
"I sought the fount of fire in hollow reed Hid privily,
a measureless resource For man, and mighty teacher of all arts."
- Prometheus Bound by Aeschylus -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered
- From: don findlay
- Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered
- Prev by Date: Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered
- Next by Date: Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered
- Previous by thread: Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered
- Next by thread: Re: New Properties of the Very Deep Earth Discovered
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
