Re: Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl
- From: Jim Lillie <jimlillie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:09:10 -0400
Aidan Karley wrote:
It must be hell being a creationist - spending years trumpetingon the alleged absence of "intermediate forms" in the fossil record
only to find that those accursed scientists go out and *find* fossils
of the "intermediate forms". I suppose the next thing to do would be
for a creationist to go out and find a new holy (as in "sacred", not as in "perforated")
text to confound matters further.
No problem Aiden. They just list everything as new 'unconnected' forms with even more 'discontinuties' in the record.
They are 'creative' that way.
Jim Lillie
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: Water - Where did it all come from?
- Next by Date: Re: Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl
- Previous by thread: Q: Water - Where did it all come from?
- Next by thread: Re: Discovery of early bird - modern bird intermediate - a water fowl
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|