Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- From: "will1" <wille1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:18:11 -0700
....zzzzzzzzzz...zzzzz...snort..snort..uh, ...I am still dreaming. What was
the question again?... Hey! Where are the boys from T.O.? Will E.
"don findlay" <don@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1152404109.145946.180260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George wrote:
"Timberwoof" <timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:timberwoof.spam-A94823.20043507072006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <1152283376.468563.157420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"don findlay" <don@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
Lucky 13 - The opiate of the cognitively challenged.
Plates are of the lithosphere, but plate boundaries are of the outer
skin of the crust.
Blatant misrepresentation of the current theory of plate tectonics;
classic straw-man argument.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
Notice how he didn't answer my earlier question:
"If subduction doesn't occur, please explain the horizontal and vertical
distribution of earthquakes on this map":
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/neic_pwaf_h.html
Talk about being cognitively challanged! That defines DF.
This has been answered a number of times in response to questions from
others. As
well, it was posted independently some time back to specifically draw
people's attention to how those earthquakes on a typical section of a
subduction zone should be interpreted. Had you not been hiding in your
killfile, and encouraging others to do likewise for the last number of
years, you would maybe have learned something, ...bum-thumping
buggerlugs.
Tell you what, if you come out of your coffin, and can encourage five
other cadavers to do likewise, then I'll tell you (again). Howzat for
a deal? But the Woof doesn't count, ..he's drooling for an answer
already (all the way from the other side of cyberspace).
ok, ..make it four then,... I think there's a good chance
decomposition has rendered the rest too far gone. But I think
everybody else has already picked up on it. So there you go. Cross
post to t.o. and physics and astro, and tell them you're about to get a
great big answer from somebody with a PhD, and they'd better be in on
it if they fancy a seat on the bus. Rainbow of white noise not
admitted. Make it clear.
George
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- From: don findlay
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- References:
- Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- From: don findlay
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- From: George
- Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- From: don findlay
- Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- Prev by Date: Re: Can someone identify this rock?
- Next by Date: Re: variation of earth surface temperature Vs thickness of the crust
- Previous by thread: Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- Next by thread: Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 13 - Plates and Plate Boundaries
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|