Re: How to classify this formation?

From: Aidan Karley <doIlookDAFTenoughTOpost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:26:10 +0100

In article <12be6h0rn9pqf2e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jo Schaper wrote:

Well, couldn't it be Glacial kettle holes then? Actually, that was my
second thought--sort of like the thousand lakes of Minnesota and various
parts of Canada...

Wouldn't surprise me. Obvious more recent modifications.

--
Aidan Karley, FGS
Aberdeen, Scotland
Written at Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:17 +0100, but posted later.

.

References:
- How to classify this formation?
  - From: Intertracer
- Re: How to classify this formation?
  - From: Jo Schaper
- Re: How to classify this formation?
  - From: Aidan Karley
- Re: How to classify this formation?
  - From: Jo Schaper

Prev by Date: Re: How to classify this formation?
Next by Date: Re: Antartica 40,000,000 years ago?
Previous by thread: Re: How to classify this formation?
Next by thread: Re: How to classify this formation?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: OT: Is it just me?
... I say we send them U-Hauls instead of water. ... We have lakes in Minnesota, ...
(rec.sport.golf)
Re: OT sorta
... The Land O' Lakes is not the only state with lakes. ... I'm not picking on Minnesota, ...
(alt.sys.pc-clone.dell)
Re: hey robby chargers have no significant meaning..do u know why the lakers and dodgers
... i think the lakers were from minnesota and they have lots of lakes ... i have no clue how the dodgers were named. ...
(rec.sport.pro-wrestling)
Re: How to classify this formation?
... Aidan Karley wrote: ... couldn't it be Glacial kettle holes then? ... that was my second thought--sort of like the thousand lakes of Minnesota and various parts of Canada... ...
(sci.geo.geology)