Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rkt5g21rvh1gpcf77bumb554tk7maqd8bt@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 09:40:38 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <15m5g29muqlbnqt7rv4d7ecvmpprkmkjk9@xxxxxxx>,
J. Taylor <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 02:37:28 -0400, "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ipb4g25grhhnjf6fmh6ak8ojvgm8jt4cqa@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:39:47 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In an obscure thread in this ng that you Real Geologists wouldn't
touch
with a ten-foot pole, this Don Findlay person wrote that plate
tectonics
theory is "based on the assumption of a panthalassa." I wrote that
that
is wrong. Plate tectonics theory is based on the assumption that
physics, geochemistry, geophysics, thermodynamics, fluid flow,
seismography, astronomic theories on planetary formation, and so
forth
are correct. (Observations and interpretations follow, with the
conclusion that the curst consists of plates that move around ...
and
that the continents were stuck together in various supercontinent
configurations in the past.)

Of course, since you Real Geologists know better than to waste your
time
arguing with that funny little man who won't talk to you at
geodynamics
conferences down under, none of you read that, nobody answered me,
and
now he's dancing with glee. Maybe he thinks I'm as lonely as he is.
Not
that I actually care what Don "200 years of physics is wrong"
Findlay
thinks >
At a most basic level a discussion cannot exist where there is
dishonesty. Would you mind providing a link where Don said, "200
years of physics is wrong" since you placed it in quotes, to signify
it was his statement. The only person I remember making that
statement is you, claiming it is what Don is saying, not that he
said
it.

It is not a small point, since you are the one making all sorts of
claims as to what is or is not EE, then claiming it is the position
of
those giving evidence for it.

It is not only dishonest, but a sign of desperation. You have
nothing
so you make things up.

JT

The dishonesty is in EEers making wild assed guesses at how all of the
continents around the Pacific are alleged to have been stuck together
200
million years ago with no coroborating physical evidence whatsoever to
support the wild assed guess.

And is just an out and out lie. Further proof of your dishonesty and
desperation.

I'm still waiting for your coroborating rock
samples and stratigraphic reconstructions across the north and south
Pacific Ocean, Mr. T.

And I know you will not accept any evidence presented in support of
EE, but will just deny its existence. Which means, it is just another
lie you are waiting.

J Taylot, it seems like weeks since you offered anything remotely
resembling actual facts and observations. Lately you've focused purely
on trying to discredit everyone around here by throwing around big words
like dishonesty, desperation, and fantasy. If EE made any sense at all,
then you could answer questions that have been put to you without
complaining that the questions themselves are dishonest or deceitful.
But the simple fact is, there's nothing to EE; it's just a cherished
belief of yours, and you refuse to critically examine it. The depth of
your thinking is limited to one-liners or turgid word-salad.

Still making claims which show your dishonesty and desperation.

JT

Like he said, word salad. Do you want Ranch or Italian with your salad?

George


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?
    ... this Don Findlay person wrote that plate ... that I actually care what Don "200 years of physics is wrong" Findlay ... those giving evidence for it. ... The dishonesty is in EEers making wild assed guesses at how all of the ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?
    ... this Don Findlay person wrote that plate ... that I actually care what Don "200 years of physics is wrong" Findlay ... those giving evidence for it. ... The dishonesty is in EEers making wild assed guesses at how all of the ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?
    ... this Don Findlay person wrote that plate ... that I actually care what Don "200 years of physics is wrong" Findlay ... those giving evidence for it. ... The dishonesty is in EEers making wild assed guesses at how all of the ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?
    ... this Don Findlay person wrote that plate tectonics ... that I actually care what Don "200 years of physics is wrong" Findlay ... but a sign of desperation. ... The dishonesty is in EEers making wild assed guesses at how all of the ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?
    ... this Don Findlay person wrote that plate tectonics ... that I actually care what Don "200 years of physics is wrong" Findlay ... The dishonesty is in EEers making wild assed guesses at how all of the ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
Loading