Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?


Charles Cagle wrote:
In article
<timberwoof.spam-BCEA96.09403809092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


J Taylot, it seems like weeks since you offered anything remotely
resembling actual facts and observations. Lately you've focused purely
on trying to discredit everyone around here by throwing around big words
like dishonesty, desperation, and fantasy. If EE made any sense at all,
then you could answer questions that have been put to you without
complaining that the questions themselves are dishonest or deceitful.
But the simple fact is, there's nothing to EE; it's just a cherished
belief of yours, and you refuse to critically examine it. The depth of
your thinking is limited to one-liners or turgid word-salad.

Objections to EE abound but at the center of most is the claim of a lack
of a mechanism

Thats false. There are two things that are at the center of objectiosn
to EE.

No unamibiguous evidence for expansion.

No mechanism.

Other than that, it is great hypothesis.



If one suggests a hitherto unknown mechanism for the
creation of mass in an ex nihilo process, laughter is the compensation,
with a claim that the laws of physics with respect to conservation of mass
and energy have some 200 years of experimental verification. What we
actually have a right to suggest is that all known chemical and nuclear
processes are conservative. The key is 'all known'.

Thats great.

FInd evidence of your new physics. Then talk.

<snip>

Stuart

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the Laws of physics?
    ... After reading what Tom said my view is that we have many facts ... >>> science ... > which is all I suspect most students can handle. ... I had the privelege of teaching a course in Physics for the Terrified ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
    ... competence in physics lies mainly in non-relativistic physics. ... of your irrelevant ad hominem innuendo has embarrassed you. ... con artist Einstein DIDN'T change his bullshit. ... DID learn such facts? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
    ... danger of extinction by a UN conference that ended Friday." ... pause, the better. ... competence in physics lies mainly in non-relativistic physics. ... DID learn such facts? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
    ... >>> physics, expect on matters of observational fact. ... >> science that deals with the notion that no observer can claim any>> priory over ... Each observer observes their own set of facts, and so to claim that matters of observable facts are not worthy of discussion, as I said, interesting. ... but it's not a public forum for public discourse. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Not even duff science!
    ... them work closely with conservationists and conservation organisations. ... But as such people don't exist outside your head, ... The evidence, as shown in your posts going back years, is against you. ... Your attempt at a witticism has fallen flat because the facts we are ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)