Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?

In article
<s_k_y_bolt99-1609060418100001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
s_k_y_bolt99@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Charles Cagle) wrote:

In article
<timberwoof.spam-BCEA96.09403809092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


J Taylot, it seems like weeks since you offered anything remotely
resembling actual facts and observations. Lately you've focused purely
on trying to discredit everyone around here by throwing around big words
like dishonesty, desperation, and fantasy. If EE made any sense at all,
then you could answer questions that have been put to you without
complaining that the questions themselves are dishonest or deceitful.
But the simple fact is, there's nothing to EE; it's just a cherished
belief of yours, and you refuse to critically examine it. The depth of
your thinking is limited to one-liners or turgid word-salad.

Objections to EE abound but at the center of most is the claim of a lack
of a mechanism. If one suggests a hitherto unknown mechanism for the
creation of mass in an ex nihilo process, laughter is the compensation,
with a claim that the laws of physics with respect to conservation of mass
and energy have some 200 years of experimental verification. What we
actually have a right to suggest is that all known chemical and nuclear
processes are conservative. The key is 'all known'. The notion of the
conservation of mass then would also suggest that all the mass that is
present in the universe is all that ever was and all that ever could be
(with a somewhat limited allowance for mass that is converted into energy
via fusion).

Yeah, it would, and so far that has caused problems only for those
wishing that the Earth's oil reserves were infinite and a few kooks on
some obscure newsgroups.

<snip fanciful strings of words not nearly as interesting or rigorous as
Penrose>

From these principles or heads which emerged from deductive processes
related to simple axioms of quantum - quantum motions one can obtains
solutions of the nature of matter, charge, and much much more including a
new model for fusion, the proof that stars don't work by fusion, that
supernova's are different than has been taught, and much much more.

Now you get to explain some more things.

1. What chemical elements would such newly created mass appear as?

2. How did this mass get created in exactly the correct chemical
composition so as to be indistinguishable from what's expected from
current planetary formation theories?

3. How did that newly created mass acquire exactly the correct dynamic
vectors to keep the Earth and the moon in their orbits?

4. How come the continents don't actually show the deformations
associated with having been formed on a small sphere and being stretched
onto a large one?

5. How come you haven't published your results anywhere?

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?
    ... resembling actual facts and observations. ... like dishonesty, desperation, and fantasy. ... creation of mass in an ex nihilo process, laughter is the compensation, ... via fusion). ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
    ... You need to get your facts right. ... Photons have mass as clearly demonstrated by the fact that they gain ... No that is how they are modelled in modern physics. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Impact on musicians of new airline bans....(some OT opinion added)
    ... that best fit the observed facts rather than bending facts to best fit ... Maybe you think I had a "mass ... UFO and he has scientific training, and I presume is not given to "mass ... Universe better than we humans here on Earth have done thus far. ...
    (rec.music.makers.trumpet)
  • Re: This Weeks Finds in Mathematical Physics Louis
    ... > You still refuse to post any facts. ... Here is another F=ma is the formula for acceleration not gravity. ... Here is another mass is not the same thing as weight. ... You refuse to listen. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Impact on musicians of new airline bans....(some OT opinion added)
    ... that best fit the observed facts rather than bending facts to best fit ... Maybe you think I had a "mass ... UFO and he has scientific training, and I presume is not given to "mass ... Universe better than we humans here on Earth have done thus far. ...
    (rec.music.makers.trumpet)