Re: plate tectonics is based on what assumptions?

In article
<timberwoof.spam-BCEA96.09403809092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


J Taylot, it seems like weeks since you offered anything remotely
resembling actual facts and observations. Lately you've focused purely
on trying to discredit everyone around here by throwing around big words
like dishonesty, desperation, and fantasy. If EE made any sense at all,
then you could answer questions that have been put to you without
complaining that the questions themselves are dishonest or deceitful.
But the simple fact is, there's nothing to EE; it's just a cherished
belief of yours, and you refuse to critically examine it. The depth of
your thinking is limited to one-liners or turgid word-salad.

Objections to EE abound but at the center of most is the claim of a lack
of a mechanism. If one suggests a hitherto unknown mechanism for the
creation of mass in an ex nihilo process, laughter is the compensation,
with a claim that the laws of physics with respect to conservation of mass
and energy have some 200 years of experimental verification. What we
actually have a right to suggest is that all known chemical and nuclear
processes are conservative. The key is 'all known'. The notion of the
conservation of mass then would also suggest that all the mass that is
present in the universe is all that ever was and all that ever could be
(with a somewhat limited allowance for mass that is converted into energy
via fusion).

There is a solution to all these things but it takes a dedication to
ferret out the details or at least get a sense of what is logical or not
logical about objections to the ex nihilo creation of new matter in the
universe.

First, it is downright arrogant to suggest that it is not possible that a
mechanism exists for the creation of new matter when those who might
object don't really know what matter is in the first place. There's
actually quite a bit of stuff that one needs to be able to put together
into a comprehensive whole and frankly most of the people who object to EE
don't really have the ability to grasp all the details at once. I say
this because in my attempts to even provide the foundational details,
EEer's and non-EEer's alike walk off with a blank stare as if they have
neither the time nor the will to actually see if what I am presenting has
merit. In about 34 years of on again, off again research I've made some
fairly remarkable discoveries in basic physics and when one puts all of
these ideas together we obtain a clear understanding of the mechanism of
EE, the origin of mass, the origin of the elements, a new model for the
unit charge of a fundamental charged particle, the nature of gravity, the
logical deduction discovery of a new property of a gravitational field
(strong charge separation effect), the dynamics and properties of flux
loop structures and quite a bit more including straightforward data and
logic that mandates that elementary charged particles that are at rest
with respect to each other will actually behave opposite to the
expectations of Coulomb's law. In essence, I'm saying there is a whole
cloth physics available and it emerged not from inductive logic but rather
from deductive processes.

Item 1: Elementary charged particles that are overlapping in the same
momentum space will behave opposite to the expectation of Coulomb's law.

Item 2: A gravitational 'field' is a time rate gradient structure

Item 3: A gravitational source forces elementary charged particles to
overlap in momentum space.

Item 4: Since elementary charged particles that overlap in momentum space
behave oppostite to the expectation of Coulomb's law then we deduce that a
gravitational field produces a strong charge separation effect.

Item 5: Electrons are excluded from the near region of a gravitational terminus

Item 6: Only protons and neutron can collect along a gravitational
terminus line or loop.

Item 7: The matter that accumulates along a gravitational terminus line
will be heavy because there are no electrons and hence it will only have
nuclear volume and not atomic volume.

Item 8: That matter which accumulates along the gravitational terminus
will be dark also because without electrons no electron can fall down to
ground states and emit radiation.

Item 9: The discovery of a new model of the unit charge led to
understanding and unifying electromagnetism and gravity so that it can be
said that a gravitational unit charge can be produced by a charge and its
charge conjugate in superposition.

Item 10: Every flux loop (E or H) can be reduced to n charges and n
charge conjugates in superposition.

Item 11: Therefore every flux loop produces a gravitational 'field'.

Item 12: An E flux loop's secondary vectors are H so that every E flux
loop displays the characteristics of a magnetic dipole

Item 13: An H flux loop's secondary vectors are E so that every E flux
loop displays the characteristics of an electric dipole

Item 14: Any large scale flux loop can oscillate between modes (E and H)
and any large scale flux loop can make quantum scale copies of itself at
its inner equator when in the compact H loop mode.

From these principles or heads which emerged from deductive processes
related to simple axioms of quantum - quantum motions one can obtains
solutions of the nature of matter, charge, and much much more including a
new model for fusion, the proof that stars don't work by fusion, that
supernova's are different than has been taught, and much much more.

Charles Cagle...

--
for email delete underscores
"I sought the fount of fire in hollow reed Hid privily,
a measureless resource For man, and mighty teacher of all arts."
- Prometheus Bound by Aeschylus -
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Quantum Flux
    ... It is not the magnetic monopole that Dirac theorized. ... That was an attempt at making charge symmetrical with magnetism. ... those particles displaying unique flux patterns due to ... charge, mass, and magnet all together the presumption of the electron ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Background of unification model
    ... hope to answer this challenge by calculating charge densities for my ... The first two demonstrate that my field theory works in flat spacetime ... gravity which must be a theory about a dynamic metric. ... choice of metric and connection for the differential manifold. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: anti gravity
    ... Light is angular momentum per second. ... An electron, proton, or neutron that spins produces a strong nuclear charge ... There is a strong nuclear charge around an electron's mass, ... I have an equation that may show anti gravity and it seems to be directly ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: on the nature of gravity
    ... You see below he describes photons as ... > gravitational charge units or packets. ... > unification of electromagnetism and gravity and hence the nature of a ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
    ... >> differentials might have a mechanism. ... >> Charge differentials seem to work fine for me and a bit of particle ... > for gravity that is other than 1/r^2. ... > If you are going that far away then if you assume that negative phase ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)