Re: Stuart on Nova

On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 21:07:42 -0500, "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"Robert Flory" <wyogeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9dednTLlP5pxcBPYnZ2dnUVZ_revnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dh5to2loa06j6censkp2ukvp9s73pjdaj1@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 08:47:02 -0500, bbbixby@xxxxxxxxx (Barbara Hughes)
wrote:


J. Taylor, nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, says, in part: "The next
will be Alaska, Oregon, or Japan, or so the system hopes to warn..."

Me. Don't forget the potential danger off the Canary Islands. No one
is making light of disasters but hand-wringing after the fact changes
nothing.


The point, the ONLY reason we saw Stuart was the disaster, the ONLY
reason we will see him again is if there is another.

Now if he was to actual come up with some science which was able to
predict and avoid such disasters I would buy the popcorn.

JT

Only after disasters....

Why I'll bet that if we were in the neighborhood the price of a beer or
dinner would get a few minutes of real face time with Stuart. At least
those who aren't pains. One would hope that we'd see him again if the
work he and others do limit the disasters effect on the human end of the
equation. That is one of the major reasons for a whole lot of work. The
earth will do what it pleases, with a little information and attention,
maybe we can avoid the natural consequences living in a cannon barrel so
to speak.

Bob

The only time I ever 'see' Taylor these days is when he makes stupid
remarks like those and someone responds. I think I'd take Stuart's
position over Taybo's anytime. It's a no-brainer.


Hi George, more than happy to help you configure your killfill so you
do not have to continue pretending to be using one.

Please no response from any one else, it is my Christmas present to
have the last word and he knows it, but unable to respond without
making a lie to what he said above.

JT
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stuart on Nova
    ... The point, the ONLY reason we saw Stuart was the disaster, the ONLY ... predict and avoid such disasters I would buy the popcorn. ... dinner would get a few minutes of real face time with Stuart. ... The only time I ever 'see' Taylor these days is when he makes stupid ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Stuart on Nova
    ... J. Taylor, nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, says, in part: ... will be Alaska, Oregon, or Japan, or so the system hopes to warn..." ... The point, the ONLY reason we saw Stuart was the disaster, the ONLY ... predict and avoid such disasters I would buy the popcorn. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Stuart on Nova
    ... J. Taylor, nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, says, in part: ... will be Alaska, Oregon, or Japan, or so the system hopes to warn..." ... The point, the ONLY reason we saw Stuart was the disaster, the ONLY ... predict and avoid such disasters I would buy the popcorn. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: The Challenge to Larry Parr
    ... >> The pseudonymns Xylothist and Paulie Graff have not posted to this ... Do you mean the people who ban books or the people whose books are ... > Or do you mean to dismiss the fact that Taylor Kingston did this - for ... > whatever reason he did so - as a comment on truth-telling? ...
    (rec.games.chess.politics)
  • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
    ... Mercury orbital perturbation is due to its movement along a shortest ... >>The essential reason for space time curvature is that gravity is ... say Taylor does not understand ... It never seems to occur to cranks what is so obvious to anyone ...
    (sci.physics)