Re: I spy with my little eye...


"Florian" <firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1hut6z1.e3guh49uuaqsN%firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Landy <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Florian" <firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1hut3g8.1nqbq0uw22ywoN%firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Landy <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I don't have time to do a critique of a paper - that's why I'm not
being
specific.

Absence of argument = absence of critic.
Then your contribution is null.

You're welcome to develop your arguments.
Arguing with people like you is like trying to argue with creationsists,
there's no point in wating my energy. Cheerio.......

Comparing the earth expansion to creationism or other crackpot theories
is just dishonnesty.

Moreover, by refusing to give solid arguments and refusing to look at
facts, you just behave like a crackpot. So are you a crackpot?

--
Florian

No, I think the dishonesty occurs when expansionists can't/won't seriously
address all the flaws in their arguments/data that have been pointed out ad
nauseum for many years on this newsgroup. You can't honestly expect for us
to address each and every person who comes here with the exact same flawed
arguments year after year, day after day. If you truly want answers to
your questions, I suggest you take the time to browse the archives of this
newsgroup and find all the posts made regarding this issue, read them, and
them post responses that address the issues we've already pointed out.

No expansionist to date has ever adequately addressed the refutations we've
already posted, so don't get so high and mighty when we simply write off
your regurgitated arguments as being nonsense. If you understood the
history of these arguments on this NG, you'd understand why we respond the
way we do. We simply feel that we've wasted enough time and expended enough
effect on this issue, and until our refutations are taken seriously, and
are adequately addressed, you are simply pissing in the wind, as far as
we're concerned. I say "we', because I think I can speak for most PTers on
this NG regarding this issue.

George


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I spy with my little eye...
    ... Absence of argument = absence of critic. ... Comparing the earth expansion to creationism or other crackpot theories ... No expansionist to date has ever adequately addressed the refutations we've ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: I spy with my little eye...
    ... Absence of argument = absence of critic. ... Comparing the earth expansion to creationism or other crackpot theories ... (I'm_Sure_YOU_can, George, ... ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: I spy with my little eye...
    ... Absence of argument = absence of critic. ... Comparing the earth expansion to creationism or other crackpot theories ... (I'm_Sure_YOU_can, George, ... ...
    (sci.geo.geology)