Re: I spy with my little eye...
- From: J. Taylor <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:55:24 GMT
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:45:24 +0100, firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian)
wrote:
George <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, I think the dishonesty occurs when expansionists can't/won't seriously
address all the flaws in their arguments/data that have been pointed out ad
nauseum for many years on this newsgroup. You can't honestly expect for us
to address each and every person who comes here with the exact same flawed
arguments year after year, day after day. If you truly want answers to
your questions, I suggest you take the time to browse the archives of this
newsgroup and find all the posts made regarding this issue, read them, and
them post responses that address the issues we've already pointed out.
No expansionist to date has ever adequately addressed the refutations we've
already posted, so don't get so high and mighty when we simply write off
your regurgitated arguments as being nonsense. If you understood the
history of these arguments on this NG, you'd understand why we respond the
way we do. We simply feel that we've wasted enough time and expended enough
effect on this issue, and until our refutations are taken seriously, and
are adequately addressed, you are simply pissing in the wind, as far as
we're concerned. I say "we', because I think I can speak for most PTers on
this NG regarding this issue.
George
I'll check the archives then. But some leads to this debunking would be
helpful.
Ron (alias George) is just lying, again
JT
.
- References:
- Re: I spy with my little eye...
- From: George
- Re: I spy with my little eye...
- From: Florian
- Re: I spy with my little eye...
- Prev by Date: Re: I spy with my little eye...
- Next by Date: gist2773
- Previous by thread: Re: I spy with my little eye...
- Next by thread: Re: I spy with my little eye...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading